President Dr Arif Alvi, has rejected six similar representations preferred by Habib Bank Ltd (HBL) against the decisions of the Banking Ombudsman, and directed HBL to refund and compensate the six defrauded customers with their stolen money and observed that since the bank failed to prove observance of relevant provision of laws, rules and regulations, therefore, its representations were devoid of any merit and deserved to be rejected.
The President rejected HBL’s six representations involving a total amount of Rs. one million and observed that victims were deprived of their hard earned deposits when the bank unilaterally activated the electronic funds transfer (EFT) facility without the request/consent of account holders and failed to put in place necessary safeguards against online exploitation of the account holders by the fraudsters.
In all six cases, the President found the bank negligent of its duty to inform the account holders about the pros and cons of activating the electronic funds transfer (EFT) as required by the mandatory guidelines of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP). Had the bank not opened EFT facility without customers’ consent, the account holders could have avoided the financial loss, he added.
The President rejected the bank’s claim that all transactions were 3D secured, being a secondary step, by observing that the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), required all banks to register its customers for internet banking prior to offering them internet based products and services and putting in place all necessary safety measures to safeguard its clients from fraudsters.
In his decisions, the President concluded that since the bank could not produce any evidence to the effect that it had complied with the provisions of relevant laws, rules and regulations, therefore, its representations were devoid of any merit and deserved to be rejected.
According to details, the account holders were called by fraudsters who lured them in their trap by providing them information regarding their names, CNIC, dates of birth, ATM Card numbers and obtained from them the names of their mothers and used this information to deprive the account holders of their deposits by making multiple e-commerce transactions, even though the bank customers were not using any mobile app and they were also in possession of their ATM Cards.—APP
