AGL38▲ 0.01 (0.00%)AIRLINK210.38▼ -5.15 (-0.02%)BOP9.48▼ -0.32 (-0.03%)CNERGY6.48▼ -0.31 (-0.05%)DCL8.96▼ -0.21 (-0.02%)DFML38.37▼ -0.59 (-0.02%)DGKC96.92▼ -3.33 (-0.03%)FCCL36.4▼ -0.3 (-0.01%)FFL14.95▲ 0.46 (0.03%)HUBC130.69▼ -3.44 (-0.03%)HUMNL13.29▼ -0.34 (-0.02%)KEL5.5▼ -0.19 (-0.03%)KOSM6.93▼ -0.39 (-0.05%)MLCF44.78▼ -1.09 (-0.02%)NBP59.07▼ -2.21 (-0.04%)OGDC230.13▼ -2.46 (-0.01%)PAEL39.29▼ -1.44 (-0.04%)PIBTL8.31▼ -0.27 (-0.03%)PPL200.35▼ -2.99 (-0.01%)PRL38.88▼ -1.93 (-0.05%)PTC26.88▼ -1.43 (-0.05%)SEARL103.63▼ -4.88 (-0.04%)TELE8.45▼ -0.29 (-0.03%)TOMCL35.25▼ -0.58 (-0.02%)TPLP13.52▼ -0.32 (-0.02%)TREET25.01▲ 0.63 (0.03%)TRG64.12▲ 2.97 (0.05%)UNITY34.52▼ -0.32 (-0.01%)WTL1.78▲ 0.06 (0.03%)

No fees for inheritance certificates by NADRA: SHC

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

 

KarachiThe Sindh High Court has halted the National Database and Registration Authority from collecting fees for the issuance of inheritance certificates.During the hearing on a petition challenging NADRA’s fee for this service, the court sought responses from the parties involved, including the deputy attorney general and assistant advocate general.The petitioner’s lawyer argued that NADRA continues to collect fees even when inheritance certificate requests are rejected.

Under NADRA’s own regulations, fees can only be charged when services are provided, and rejecting a request does not qualify as a service.The lawyer further contended that inheritance certificates are meant to distribute property among legal heirs according to Islamic law, and the current fee of Rs22,000 is unjustifiable.The court ordered NADRA to cease charging fees for both inheritance certificates and letters of administration.However, it clarified that fees for regular services, such as issuing identity cards and family registration certificates, may continue as usual.

The court raised questions regarding whether NADRA can charge fees based on property ownership and whether the state is entitled to collect fees for inheritance certificates.

The court has requested further clarification on these issues and has set a deadline of September 29 for responses from all parties, including the deputy attorney general and assistant advocate general.

Related Posts

Get Alerts