AGL40▼ -0.21 (-0.01%)AIRLINK127.55▼ -0.09 (0.00%)BOP6.67▲ 0 (0.00%)CNERGY4.5▲ 0.05 (0.01%)DCL8.65▼ -0.08 (-0.01%)DFML41▼ -0.16 (0.00%)DGKC85.72▼ -0.39 (0.00%)FCCL33.05▲ 0.49 (0.02%)FFBL64.5▲ 0.12 (0.00%)FFL11.59▼ -0.02 (0.00%)HUBC112.11▼ -0.35 (0.00%)HUMNL15.14▲ 0.33 (0.02%)KEL5.2▲ 0.16 (0.03%)KOSM7.59▲ 0.23 (0.03%)MLCF40.3▼ -0.03 (0.00%)NBP61▼ -0.08 (0.00%)OGDC192.5▼ -1.68 (-0.01%)PAEL27.12▲ 0.21 (0.01%)PIBTL7.4▲ 0.12 (0.02%)PPL152.9▲ 0.22 (0.00%)PRL26.34▲ 0.12 (0.00%)PTC17.23▲ 1.09 (0.07%)SEARL85.6▼ -0.1 (0.00%)TELE7.63▼ -0.04 (-0.01%)TOMCL34.31▼ -2.16 (-0.06%)TPLP8.7▼ -0.09 (-0.01%)TREET17.05▲ 0.21 (0.01%)TRG63.58▲ 0.84 (0.01%)UNITY27.84▼ -0.36 (-0.01%)WTL1.31▼ -0.03 (-0.02%)

ET reserves decision on appeal of Atif Khan

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

Election Tribunal Judge Justice Shakeel Ahmed on Friday reserved a decision on the appeal of former Khyber Pakhtunkhwa minister Atif Khan against the rejection of his nomination papers by the Returning Officer.

During a hearing on the appeal of the former pro-vincial minister the judge remarked that the people were the best judges in elections and they could elect whomever they wanted. He said that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court had already made it clear that no one could be “Sadiq” and “Ameen” except Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH). He questioned the lawyer of the Election Commission whether the nomination paper of an absconder could be rejected. The EC lawyer referred to a judgment of Sindh High Court and another of the Balochistan High Court. The petitioner’s lawyer contended that Atif Khan’s papers were rejected due to an FIR and in the light of a decision of the Balochistan High Court.—INP

Related Posts