Foreign Office has criticised Washington’s imposition of sanctions on Chinese firms allegedly linked to Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme, labelling these measures as biased and politically motivated. FO spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch’s response underscores a broader issue that merits attention: double standards and discriminatory practices prevalent in enforcement of global non-proliferation norms. Her comments, particularly the assertion that ‘some countries while claiming strict adherence to non-proliferation norms, have conveniently waived licensing requirements for advanced military technologies to their favoured states,’ reflect a significant concern that needs addressing.
It is well documented that international non-proliferation frameworks often exhibit a duality in their application. Certain nations, especially those with significant geo-political influence, are able to secure exceptions or obtain advanced military technologies under the guise of strategic partnerships or alliances. This practice not only skews the playing field but also perpetuates an environment of distrust and imbalance.
For instance, there are numerous cases where advanced military technologies have been transferred or licensed to key allies without stringent scrutiny, while other nations face sanctions based on allegations that may lack comprehensive evidence. This discrepancy not only creates an uneven application of international norms but also fuels geo-political rivalries.
When some countries are exempt from strict licensing requirements, it inevitably leads to increased military asymmetry and regional instability. Hence, it is imperative for the US to reconsider its approach to non-proliferation and technology transfer policies.
Discriminatory practices that favour certain states over others can have far-reaching consequences. They not only undermine integrity of global non-proliferation regimes but also heighten tensions in regions already fraught with conflict. A more equitable and transparent approach to enforcement is essential to advancing genuine arms control and disarmament goals.
