AGL38.01▲ 0.21 (0.01%)AIRLINK141.2▲ 6.79 (0.05%)BOP5.42▼ -0.04 (-0.01%)CNERGY3.86▲ 0 (0.00%)DCL7.58▲ 0.16 (0.02%)DFML45.62▲ 0.4 (0.01%)DGKC78.11▼ -0.01 (0.00%)FCCL29.29▲ 0.21 (0.01%)FFBL56.58▲ 0.63 (0.01%)FFL8.6▲ 0.08 (0.01%)HUBC94.8▼ -3.51 (-0.04%)HUMNL14.46▲ 0.28 (0.02%)KEL3.86▼ -0.03 (-0.01%)KOSM6.82▼ -0.04 (-0.01%)MLCF36.44▲ 0.17 (0.00%)NBP70.5▲ 0.61 (0.01%)OGDC166.5▼ -0.56 (0.00%)PAEL25.77▲ 0.55 (0.02%)PIBTL6.68▲ 0 (0.00%)PPL131.3▲ 0.83 (0.01%)PRL25.41▲ 0.11 (0.00%)PTC14.54▼ -0.83 (-0.05%)SEARL58▲ 0.12 (0.00%)TELE6.85▼ -0.02 (0.00%)TOMCL34.61▲ 0.05 (0.00%)TPLP7.55▼ -0.09 (-0.01%)TREET14▲ 0.01 (0.00%)TRG44.95▲ 0.04 (0.00%)UNITY25.42▲ 0.28 (0.01%)WTL1.21▲ 0 (0.00%)

Trump loses immunity bid in defamation suit

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

Donald Trump cannot assert presidential immunity from a defamation lawsuit by writer E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of rape, a US appeals court ruled on Wednesday, dealing the former US president another legal setback.

The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Man-hattan upheld a federal judge’s decision to reject Trump’s claim of immunity, finding Trump had waited too long to raise it as a defence.

Alina Habba, one of Trump’s lawyers in the case, called the ruling “fundamentally flawed” and said Trump would seek “immediate review” from the Supreme Court.

Carroll in the lawsuit sought at least $10 million in damages from Trump over comments he made in June 2019, when he was president, after she first publicly accused him of raping her in a Manhattan department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.

Trump denied knowing Carroll, said she was not his “type,” and that she made up the rape claim to promote her upcoming memoir.

The former Elle magazine columnist sued in Nov 2019, but Trump waited until Dec 2022 before asserting that absolute presidential immunity shielded him from her lawsuit. Under this, a president has complete immunity from many types of civil lawsuits while in office.

In June, US District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan rejected Trump’s bid to dismiss Carroll’s case and later refused to let Trump raise an immunity defence, citing the delay in seeking to invoke it and the public interest in accountability.

The 2nd Circuit on Wednesday said those decisions were correct. “A three-year-delay is more than enough, under our precedents, to qualify as ‘undue,’” a three-judge panel wrote in its opinion.—APP

 

Related Posts