AGL40▲ 0 (0.00%)AIRLINK129.06▼ -0.47 (0.00%)BOP6.75▲ 0.07 (0.01%)CNERGY4.49▼ -0.14 (-0.03%)DCL8.55▼ -0.39 (-0.04%)DFML40.82▼ -0.87 (-0.02%)DGKC80.96▼ -2.81 (-0.03%)FCCL32.77▲ 0 (0.00%)FFBL74.43▼ -1.04 (-0.01%)FFL11.74▲ 0.27 (0.02%)HUBC109.58▼ -0.97 (-0.01%)HUMNL13.75▼ -0.81 (-0.06%)KEL5.31▼ -0.08 (-0.01%)KOSM7.72▼ -0.68 (-0.08%)MLCF38.6▼ -1.19 (-0.03%)NBP63.51▲ 3.22 (0.05%)OGDC194.69▼ -4.97 (-0.02%)PAEL25.71▼ -0.94 (-0.04%)PIBTL7.39▼ -0.27 (-0.04%)PPL155.45▼ -2.47 (-0.02%)PRL25.79▼ -0.94 (-0.04%)PTC17.5▼ -0.96 (-0.05%)SEARL78.65▼ -3.79 (-0.05%)TELE7.86▼ -0.45 (-0.05%)TOMCL33.73▼ -0.78 (-0.02%)TPLP8.4▼ -0.66 (-0.07%)TREET16.27▼ -1.2 (-0.07%)TRG58.22▼ -3.1 (-0.05%)UNITY27.49▲ 0.06 (0.00%)WTL1.39▲ 0.01 (0.01%)

BRI & Role of Middle Corridors and Forces of Hegemony | By Dr Mehmood-ul-Hassan Khan

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

BRI & Role of Middle Corridors and Forces of Hegemony

The Chinese One Belt & One Road Initiative (BRI) has entered into its 10th year during which it has succeeded to win “hearts and minds” of the people living around the globe. However, forces of hegemony are also active to derail the project in Central Asia through false and fake propaganda.

Actually, they tried to start another “end-game” to sabotage the socio-economic and geopolitical development in these countries. Even before the scheduled visit of the US Secretary Antony Blinken to India, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, the US Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu showed his country’s serious concerns about the Chinese loans and projects.

On the contrary, the BRI has been a “connecting hub” and “bridging force” between the continents, communities and corporations, working jointly to achieve the dreams of greater regional connectivity through world class infrastructure development, immense socio-economic integration and last but not the least formation of middle corridors. In this regard, formation of the Middle Corridor (MC) has further enhanced the BRI connectivity and potential utility.

The MC is a trade route that spans the Central Asian green fields, the Caspian Sea and the Caucasus Mountains and the dawn of the BRI has further enhanced its trans-regional connectivity. The route is part of China’s ‘Belt and Road’ initiative. It is known as the China-Central Asia-West Asia Corridor which links China and the regional markets of East Asia with Georgia, Turkey and the European markets.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict has opened a new window of opportunity for the regional countries. Leaders of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Central Asian States have grasped the emerging opportunity and initiated inter-state cooperation through regular bilateral visits and the signing of memorandums on the minimization of tariffs and border crossing hurdles and jointly working for the development of the MC. In this regard, Turkey first conceived the corridor in the late 2000s, creating the necessary ferry, port, railway and road infrastructure across Central Asia and the Caspian Sea.

There have been lots of meaningful projects launched for the further strengthening of the MC. The “Trans-Kazakhstan Railway” was opened in 2014. The completion of the “Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway” was another milestone completed in 2017. It enabled rail passage through the Caucasus Mountains for the first time since the 1990s.

Seemingly, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in particular, actively collaborated to turn the MC into a reality. Together with China and Turkey, these countries have held a series of conferences and ministerial meetings to improve their cross-border rail links and reduce trade friction between them.

Azerbaijan holds the geographical advantage in the MC and is situated on the East-West trade route, connecting Europe and China, opens up a lot of opportunities. It has enhanced its potential of transit shipments, transport and logistics sectors.

During November 2022, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey signed a roadmap for the simultaneous elimination of bottlenecks and the development of the “Middle Corridor” for 2022-2027. The implementation of the agreements will allow increasing the capacity along the corridor to 10 million tons per year by 2025

At the same time, the MC promises to become a regional power centre. Even Uzbekistan, has supported the development of the MC and tries to build its own railway networks that would connect to the corridor. According to Uzbekistan Railways (December 2022), Uzbekistan organized a train bypassing Russia in December 2022.

For the further strengthening of the MC Azerbaijan, Türkiye and Uzbekistan signed “Tashkent Declaration” to reshape the cooperation of the participating countries in multiple spheres from economy to trade, transportation and energy, as well as address the regional and global security challenges.

To conclude, CPEC Phase-II has the potential to further enhance the prospects of greater regional connectivity between the South Asia, Central Asia and South Caucasus regions. In this regard, there is an urgent need to further improve regional trade with all the Central Asian countries and Azerbaijan. Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan trade and economic relations are constantly on the rise which should be further expanded because the potential of trade between both the regions are much greater than the current level of trade volumes.

Azerbaijan’s “superior” and “supporting” economic policies, befitting a “trade model” with lots of “custom exemptions”, direct flight connectivity and having strategic partnership has become a role model for other regional countries for achieving desired goals of greater regional connectivity.

Kazakhstan’s rigorous and diversified “in-person approach” has given it a comparative advantage in this regard. It follows holistic and comprehensive innovative diplomacy to increase bilateral relations in the diverse sectors of economy i.e. pharmaceutical, civil aviation (April 2023 direct flights), SMEs, energy, real estate, oil & gas, agriculture and last but not the least joint ventures in sports, surgical instruments and textiles with Pakistan and its private companies.

Uzbekistan’s “systematic” and “supportive” policies of greater regional connectivity have surpassed all the regional countries. The trans-regional railway project “(Pakistan-Uzbekistan-Afghanistan)” would be a “game changer” in the context of greater regional connectivity and trade in the days to come. Pakistan-Uzbekistan bilateral trade, economic, business and trade activities have been further increased because of its pure but simple economic diplomacy.

There is an immense potential of enhancing trade in the field of agriculture and agro-products, which needed to be tapped. Maximum facilitation should be provided to the investors of all Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to help set up their businesses in the already established Special Economic Zones across Pakistan.

There is huge scope for higher education cooperation through joint degrees, and student and faculty exchange programs. The Virtual University of Pakistan is offering online education, which is cost-effective for students of these countries.

Most recently, the 8th Session of Pakistan-Uzbekistan Inter-governmental Commission (IGC) on Trade-Economic and Scientific-Technical Cooperation was held in Uzbekistan. It was mutually agreed to extend cooperation in priority areas like transport and logistics. Moreover, the growth of mutual trade, investment and industrial cooperation and banking were also discussed. It was decided to further increase bilateral trade which reached $240 million in 2022 (highest among CIS). Both countries mutually supported the adoption of concrete measures to accelerate the practical implementation of the Agreement on Preferential Trade and Diversification of Transport Corridors in order to create prerequisites for increasing the volume of mutual trade.

An agreement was also inked to accelerate the progress of the trans-Afghan railway construction project. Moreover, MOUs to increase the volume of multimodal cargo transportation, creation of terminals on the territories of both states for further joint export of products to the markets of third countries were also signed. Furthermore, interbank partnership was also discussed to implement the mechanism of SWAP operations between central banks, the development of correspondent banking relations between the financial institutions of the two countries. The closure of banking connection should be halted and immediately restored.

Related Posts

Get Alerts