AGL54.26▲ 0.37 (0.01%)AIRLINK142.41▼ -2.02 (-0.01%)BOP10.13▼ -0.07 (-0.01%)CNERGY7.11▼ -0.06 (-0.01%)DCL13.88▼ -0.84 (-0.06%)DFML35.46▼ -0.68 (-0.02%)DGKC154.89▲ 0.98 (0.01%)FCCL44.71▼ -0.1 (0.00%)FFL15.1▲ 0.04 (0.00%)HUBC136.05▲ 2.04 (0.02%)HUMNL11.12▲ 0.08 (0.01%)KEL5.13▲ 0.07 (0.01%)KOSM5.54▼ -0.05 (-0.01%)MLCF81.35▲ 1.91 (0.02%)NBP103.83▲ 0.35 (0.00%)OGDC212.25▲ 1.57 (0.01%)PAEL38.87▼ -0.45 (-0.01%)PIBTL8.03▼ -0.12 (-0.01%)PPL163.63▲ 1.21 (0.01%)PRL32.21▼ -0.11 (0.00%)PTC23.43▼ -0.17 (-0.01%)SEARL84.58▲ 0.25 (0.00%)TELE7.35▼ -0.15 (-0.02%)TOMCL30.25▼ -0.03 (0.00%)TPLP9.27▼ -0.12 (-0.01%)TREET20.53▲ 0.08 (0.00%)TRG56.68▼ -5.12 (-0.08%)UNITY24.06▼ -0.43 (-0.02%)WTL1.45▼ -0.04 (-0.03%)

The rebirth of Pakistan

Ghulam Murtaza
Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

THE short but decisive war between India and Pakistan in early 2025 marked a watershed moment in South Asia’s strategic landscape.

Though lasting only 19 days, with key combat phases limited to 3 intense days, the conflict recalibrated geopolitical assumptions in a manner few had foreseen.

Sophisticated exchanges across the Line of Control (LoC)—ranging from conventional warfare to cyber offensives, satellite surveillance, and narrative battles—unfolded across Azad Jammu & Kashmir and Punjab’s border belts.

Pakistan’s forces not only intercepted an airborne incursion near Bhimber and repelled an armoured thrust towards Sialkot, but also projected a calibrated strength that the Modi Government had underestimated.

This confrontation was more than a military engagement—it was a paradigm shift in Pakistan’s self-perception and global standing.

At home, the war reignited national unity.

Years of criticism directed at the armed forces for political involvement and strategic miscalculations gave way to renewed respect.

Operational maturity and disciplined defence efforts reversed prevailing narratives and re-established the military as a unifying institution.

As political factions receded into the background, the military’s strategic conduct brought a stabilizing coherence during external turbulence.

Though the civil-military equilibrium remains a sensitive subject, the war reinforced the army’s centrality to national resilience.

Internationally, the war shattered long-held assumptions.

Previously seen through the lens of economic fragility and governance deficits, Pakistan revealed a more formidable identity: a nuclear-capable nation with operational readiness, institutional discipline and a revived sense of purpose.

From Riyadh to Ankara to Beijing, capitals began reassessing Pakistan not as a struggling state on the periphery, but as a strategic anchor in the Muslim world.

Western analysts, long prone to conflating economic challenges with strategic passivity, were forced to reconsider.

India, meanwhile, suffered a psychological and ideological setback.

The dream of Akhand Bharat, long nurtured by the RSS and politically weaponized by the Modi Government, lost its sheen.

India’s inability to secure a decisive edge exposed the fragility of its expansionist rhetoric.

Domestic dissent surged, particularly in Punjab and the Northeast.

As the conflict’s link to electoral mobilization in Bihar became evident, questions multiplied over the prudence of triggering a two-front strategic crisis for domestic political gain.

The result was diplomatic isolation and strategic overreach.

In the arena of Fifth Generation Warfare (5GW), Pakistan’s performance was transformational.

For years, the country had been targeted by hybrid offensives—disinformation campaigns, psychological operations and attempts at cultural fragmentation.

Yet, the 2025 war marked a new era.

Through coordinated counter-narratives, cyber defence and indigenous media initiatives, Pakistan managed to neutralize synthetic information onslaughts.

The war reaffirmed a broader lesson: technological tools are only as effective as the ideological coherence and institutional integrity of the state wielding them.

China’s role was pivotal in shaping the conflict’s outcome.

From real-time satellite intelligence and AI-enabled cyber grids to electronic warfare support, China provided Pakistan with a strategic edge.

Its space assets detected Indian troop movements and missile deployments, allowing Pakistani forces to anticipate and neutralize threats.

Meanwhile, the underperformance of French-origin Indian radar and missile systems underscored the growing reliability gap between Western military exports and Sino-Pakistani technological integration.

This reinforced China’s role not just as an economic behemoth, but as an emerging global surveillance and defence powerhouse.

The war also triggered deep regional reverberations.

Afghanistan, while officially neutral, privately acknowledged Pakistan’s new strategic confidence.

Simultaneously, cultural diplomacy through the Kartarpur Corridor and revived ties with the Sikh diaspora gained fresh momentum.

These underutilized tools of soft power began evolving into tangible levers of influence.

Internally, the conflict catalyzed long-overdue actions against extremist factions.

A post-war cleanup targeted armed proxies and fringe ideologues, reducing domestic unrest and lending new weight to Pakistan’s global counter-extremism credentials.

Above all, Pakistan reasserted its leadership within the Muslim world.

By minimizing dependency on Western arms and showcasing indigenous competence, it reestablished its historic standing as a premier Islamic military power.

In forums such as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and trilateral platforms with Turkiye and Malaysia, Pakistan’s voice regained credibility.

The Pakistan Muslim League (PML), leveraging this moment, began steering foreign policy away from traditional Western dependency toward strategic autonomy.

This repositioning also gave rise to discussions on a digital Islamic trade bloc and a joint defence research council—once visionary, now plausible.

The roots of the 2025 conflict lay in a convergence of deliberate provocations: Israeli strategic experiments in the region, India’s hegemonic aspirations, attempts to quell Kashmiri resistance and domestic electoral compulsions.

What began as a localized skirmish rapidly evolved into a broader ideological and strategic contest, the implications of which are still unfolding.

The war concluded not with mere ceasefire lines but with a dramatic reshaping of regional doctrines and exposure of long-standing vulnerabilities.

In its aftermath, Pakistan emerged transformed—not just undefeated, but redefined.

National dignity was restored, ideological purpose reaffirmed, and regional alignments recalibrated.

If the current trajectory—marked by strategic clarity, institutional stability, and diplomatic reach—continues, Pakistan stands poised to play a commanding role not only in South Asia but across the broader Islamic world over the next decade.

—The writer is Secretary General Islamabad Chamber of Commerce and Industry. ([email protected])

 

Related Posts

Get Alerts

© 2024 All rights reserved | Pakistan Observer