The Lahore High Court has set aside a civil court’s decision regarding the dismissal of a case on the grounds of not amending the petition as directed by the lower court.
LHC Justice Shahid Waheed on Wednesday released a detailed judgement consisting of 12 pages on the plea of Akif Ali Shah.
The petitioner has challenged the decision of the civil court which dismissed his petition on technical grounds.
According to the LHC judgement, despite the orders of the court if the petitioner does not amend his application, the court still could not dismiss his application.
It was not a very big mistake on the part of the petitioner that he did not carry out the amendments to the petition and the court, on this ground, could dismiss his application.
Justice Waheed remarked that though it was against the court rule not to amend the application but the court could not fix the fault by taking suo motu action.
The judgement said that judges should not act as judicial technicians, adding that the courts should not present themselves as a workshop of technical justice.
Justice Waheed stated that there was a proverb that technical ground weakens the justice. He further remarked that the use of technical ground did not correct the mistake.
He observed that this case provoked us to think whether we should penalize those who came to the court to seek justice.
Petitioner Akif Shah had filed his petition in the civil court regarding the purchase of a house in Faisal Town.
The civil court dismissed his petition on the grounds that the petitioner did not file an amended petition as ordered by the court.
Petitioner appealed the civil court decision in sessions court where his petition also rejected. After that he submitted his case in the LHC.
The LHC has sent the petition back to civil court directing it to decide the case on merit. The court also imposed a fine on the petitioner for not amending his claim.
Meanwhile, the LHC issued a written verdict against Patwaris of Punjab, including Lahore.
The court ordered immediate shifting of Patwaris from all over Punjab from private buildings to government buildings.
Apart from that the written decision directed the DG Anti-Corruption to register cases against Patwaris working with the help of private peoples.
We must not forget that the image of Pakistan in the world can only be improved by establishing transparency and putting up resistance against corruption as a part of our culture.
Justice Chaudhry Abdul Aziz issued a six-page written verdict. It was said in the verdict that it is with great sadness that it is because of such cases that Pakistan is among the top countries in terms of corruption.
The court directed the senior member Board of Revenue not to allow any private person to work in the revenue circle in future.
If any Patwari is found involved in future, DG Anti-Corruption should take action against him.
If anyone, including DC, is involved in appointing a private servant with Patwari, then DG should take anti-corruption action.