Evidently, the Chinese BRI has become the only credible “refuge” for regional as well as international economic recovery and sustainability in the global supply chains.
The ongoing US unilateral trade and tariffs war has already produced “wrinkles” around the globe, demanding a just, fair, transparent and equal global governance and international trading system.
Meanwhile, numerous international publications and reports from the IMF, World Bank and ADB have already dubbed the BRI as the biggest project of the 21st century, geared towards immense socio-economic development, promoting trans-regional connectivity and supporting world-class infrastructure and hybrid agriculture.
However, bitter socio-economic acts of whims and hegemonic geopolitical maneuverings, alongside manipulated geo-strategic power plays, have targeted the pace, productivity and prosperity of the BRI in Africa, South Asia, Latin America and Southeast Asia.
It appears that a new international transformation is being orchestrated in the Middle East, pushing for a so-called “new Middle East” that gives superior geopolitical space and strategic status to Israel, the USA’s key ally, over other regional powers.
The ongoing Israel-Iran war is considered a giant step in that transformation, aiming to make Israel a regional leader despite its overt aggression and persistent human rights violations against Palestinians.
Israel and its IDF have launched numerous attacks on Iran, targeting civilians, infrastructure and strategic sites like Chabahar and Bandar Abbas—acts that reflect state terrorism.
Iran, a BRI member and strategic Chinese partner, maintains close cooperation with China in investment, joint ventures and security.
In response to rising tensions, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi urged restraint in calls to his Iranian and Israeli counterparts.
Statements from both Chinese and Pakistani foreign ministries in support of Iran have been seen as a moral victory for Tehran, highlighting the rising strategic convergence under BRI.
Most recently, frequent attacks on BRI and CPEC-related development projects have raised alarm, especially amidst Pakistan-India tensions and the Israel-Iran conflict.
These threats now require a strategic revision in how BRI and CPEC are operationalized—shifting from mere development to deterrence.
Economic security has become critical and must be integrated into all ongoing CPEC and BRI projects.
Unfortunately, both projects have been labelled threats to regional and global economic dominance by the West, especially the US.
Regional actors like RAW, Mossad, TTP, BLA and other militant groups are reportedly targeting BRI operations in Balochistan and elsewhere, while sabotage activities in Africa and Latin America show signs of Western involvement aiming to push out Chinese investors.
The recent visit of the US President to the Middle East was a strategic move in economic diplomacy aimed at aligning with regional partners such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar.
The goal appeared to be undermining China’s economic role in the region.
However, a deeper look at US geo-economic actions shows a hidden agenda of empowering Israel through normalization and improved ties, while addressing irritants like the Iranian nuclear program and the Houthis.
These moves serve to boost Israeli regional supremacy under the guise of regional peace and economic collaboration.
The writer maintains that there has been no real shift in the US Administration’s Middle East policy under Trump.
From the Abraham Accords to the so-called “Deal of the Century,” US foreign policy has consistently supported Israel’s expansionist agenda and military aggression against Palestinians.
Though at times the US and Israel appeared misaligned—particularly on issues like the Palestinian refugee crisis or humanitarian governance in Gaza—these differences were largely superficial.
In truth, the US has backed Israel militarily and diplomatically, especially during the ongoing conflict with Iran.
Furthermore, the US government’s use of its veto power at the UN Security Council and other forums—such as the ICJ and the UN Human Rights Commission—has obstructed peace efforts.
It has blocked resolutions for ceasefires, humanitarian aid and disarmament, particularly those sponsored by China.
These actions have revealed the US’s hidden agenda: to support Israel at all costs while undermining multilateralism, peaceful coexistence and a just global order.
In doing so, the US has propelled the world towards an obsessive, unjust system dominated by force rather than diplomacy.
The US’s continued military and financial support to Israel, along with its manipulation of international platforms, demonstrates prejudice, bigotry and strategic hypocrisy.
The writer concludes that Trump’s foreign policy has been pro-Israel and anti-China.
His recent Middle East trip only confirmed his unwavering support for Israel and his role in deepening the regional divide—using economic diplomacy as a cover for geopolitical realignment.
On the other hand, comparative studies of the BRI since its inception suggest it has become a cornerstone of international development.
Launched in response to a world facing instability and uncertainty, the BRI has emerged as a major driver of connectivity, resilience and shared progress.
With participation from over 150 countries and 30 international organizations, the BRI has enabled more than 3,000 cooperative projects worldwide—demonstrating its strategic value, inclusive framework and transformative power for sustainable development.
Projects like the Jakarta-Bandung High-Speed Railway in Indonesia, port development in Africa, energy networks in Central Asia, infrastructure advancement in South Asia and green transformation in the Middle East exemplify the BRI’s contributions.
These initiatives are accelerating economic growth, generating employment, enhancing trade and improving livelihoods.
The BRI has cultivated partnerships rooted in equality and mutual respect, allowing countries to align development strategies, boost both hard and soft connectivity and strengthen global supply chain resilience—proving itself a pillar of cooperative progress in a changing world.
