AGL42.45▲ 3.82 (0.10%)AIRLINK130.27▲ 0.56 (0.00%)BOP5.75▲ 0.11 (0.02%)CNERGY4.06▲ 0.2 (0.05%)DCL8.82▲ 0.12 (0.01%)DFML41.1▼ -0.8 (-0.02%)DGKC89.35▲ 1 (0.01%)FCCL35.18▲ 0.25 (0.01%)FFBL66.8▼ -0.22 (0.00%)FFL10.8▲ 0.23 (0.02%)HUBC109.27▲ 0.7 (0.01%)HUMNL14.93▲ 0.27 (0.02%)KEL4.79▲ 0.03 (0.01%)KOSM7.33▲ 0.38 (0.05%)MLCF43.1▲ 1.42 (0.03%)NBP61.7▲ 2.06 (0.03%)OGDC180▼ -0.31 (0.00%)PAEL26.14▼ -0.09 (0.00%)PIBTL6.04▲ 0.09 (0.02%)PPL146.5▼ -0.59 (0.00%)PRL23.8▲ 0.23 (0.01%)PTC16.7▲ 0.2 (0.01%)SEARL71.53▲ 3.11 (0.05%)TELE7.3▲ 0.11 (0.02%)TOMCL36.43▲ 0.57 (0.02%)TPLP8.11▲ 0.29 (0.04%)TREET14.76▲ 0.59 (0.04%)TRG51.18▲ 0.67 (0.01%)UNITY27.5▲ 0.74 (0.03%)WTL1.25▲ 0.04 (0.03%)

Imran, Bushra challenge Toshakhana, cypher sentences

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi challenged their respective sentences on Friday in the Toshakhana and cypher cases.

The appeals argue that both Imran and Bushra were subjected to a sham trial, where the courts not only proceeded unfairly and hastily but also ignored their fundamental right to a fair trial and due process.
The lead counsel, Barrister Syed Ali Zafar, filed two appeals, writ petitions, and applications, challenging the orders passed by the special judge and NAB during the jail trials of the Toshkhana and cypher cases.

Barrister Zafar has contended that the ex-premier and his wife have been erroneously convicted and sentenced by the accountability court and the special judge. The appeal further argued that their freedom and liberty have been curtailed, blatantly violating their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973. The evidence presented against them is deficient in every manner and fails to connect them with the alleged charges.

The filings further point out that, while passing their respective judgments, both the NAB authorities and the special judge have caused grave injustice to the aggrieved. Firstly, their trials in both cases were concluded within two to three weeks. Secondly, despite the IHC’s directive for an open trial, the public, media, etc, were not allowed to witness the trial freely.

Related Posts