THE debate surrounding the privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Pakistan has intensified, with experts urging the government to expedite the process to unlock economic growth and improve service delivery. A recent analysis reveals that SOEs are a significant drain on the national budget, incurring losses exceeding $4.1 billion in 2022. This staggering figure surpasses the annual allocations for both education and healthcare, highlighting the misallocation of critical resources.
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) stated that the continued operation of loss-making SOEs represents a major impediment to Pakistan’s economic progress. These funds could be better utilized to bolster vital sectors like education and healthcare, fostering human capital development and improving the overall well-being of the population.
Beyond the financial burden, SOEs are plagued by inefficiencies, characterized by bloated workforces, outdated operational practices and a lack of accountability. This is particularly evident in the aviation sector, where PIA grapples with a significantly higher employee-to-aircraft ratio compared to global industry benchmarks. Such inefficiencies not only impact the financial performance of these enterprises but also hinder their ability to compete effectively in the market.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) highlighted that inefficient SOEs stifle competition and hinder private sector growth. In sectors like airlines and oil & gas, SOEs operate at a disadvantage, leading to suboptimal service and limited consumer choice. Despite concerns over undervaluation and job losses, privatization’s long-term benefits often outweigh these issues. The steel mills case underscores the significant losses under state ownership, with losses exceeding initial privatization prices.
Furthermore, the argument that privatization compromises national security often lacks empirical evidence. There is no concrete evidence to suggest that private sector entities pose a greater threat to national security than SOEs in critical sectors. Conversely, privatization can lead to increased efficiency, improved financial performance and job creation. Examples like MCB Bank and National Refinery demonstrate that private sector ownership can lead to increased profitability, expanded operations and, ultimately, the creation of new employment opportunities.
The government’s role in this transition is crucial in facilitating private sector growth by creating an environment where businesses can thrive. Instead of directly managing enterprises, it should focus on ensuring a level playing field, providing equal opportunities for both large and small companies. Preventing anti-competitive practices such as monopolies and cartels is essential for maintaining a fair market. Strengthening regulatory bodies is equally important, as they safeguard fair competition, protect consumer rights, and ensure ethical business operations. This will ultimately foster a healthy, competitive market that benefits the economy and citizens.
The government must prioritize investment in critical public goods. While the private sector plays a vital role in driving economic growth, it may not always adequately address the needs of the entire population, particularly in areas like infrastructure, education, and healthcare. By investing in these essential sectors, the government can ensure that all citizens have access to vital services and opportunities. Privatization of SOEs is not merely a policy decision; it is a critical step towards unlocking Pakistan’s economic potential, emphasized by the numerous economists. By embracing efficient market mechanisms and encouraging private sector participation, Pakistan can pave the way for sustainable economic growth and improved living standards for its citizens.
—The writer is E-in-C, Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, Islamabad.
