AGL40▲ 0 (0.00%)AIRLINK129.3▼ -0.23 (0.00%)BOP6.76▲ 0.08 (0.01%)CNERGY4.47▼ -0.16 (-0.03%)DCL8.65▼ -0.29 (-0.03%)DFML40.85▼ -0.84 (-0.02%)DGKC80.9▼ -2.87 (-0.03%)FCCL32.81▲ 0.04 (0.00%)FFBL74.6▼ -0.87 (-0.01%)FFL11.68▲ 0.21 (0.02%)HUBC109.25▼ -1.3 (-0.01%)HUMNL13.85▼ -0.71 (-0.05%)KEL5.37▼ -0.02 (0.00%)KOSM7.91▼ -0.49 (-0.06%)MLCF39.25▼ -0.54 (-0.01%)NBP63.71▲ 3.42 (0.06%)OGDC197▼ -2.66 (-0.01%)PAEL25.8▼ -0.85 (-0.03%)PIBTL7.45▼ -0.21 (-0.03%)PPL156.24▼ -1.68 (-0.01%)PRL25.85▼ -0.88 (-0.03%)PTC17.6▼ -0.86 (-0.05%)SEARL79.4▼ -3.04 (-0.04%)TELE7.87▼ -0.44 (-0.05%)TOMCL33.88▼ -0.63 (-0.02%)TPLP8.51▼ -0.55 (-0.06%)TREET16.68▼ -0.79 (-0.05%)TRG58.3▼ -3.02 (-0.05%)UNITY27.61▲ 0.18 (0.01%)WTL1.4▲ 0.02 (0.01%)

Judges for legal action over agencies prying in judicial matters

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

The Balochistan High Court judges have recommended legal action against those involved in telephone taping or video-recording of the judges and their family members.

The Supreme Court larger bench hearing a case about allegations in six IHC judges’ letter regarding ‘interference’ by the security agencies in judicial matters.

The BHC judges in their recommendations agencies representatives should be prohibited. The judges also suggested to the supreme court that the complains should be kept secret.

“It is a golden opportunity for the judiciary to talk with other branches of the state to set a mechanism,” Peshawar judges said.

Related Posts

Get Alerts