Yi Fan
EARLIER this year, China declared the eradication of extreme poverty. For anyone trying to assess what it means to the country, it would be useful to look at what persistent penury has done to some of its population.
Even just 30 years ago, in desert-covered villages of northwest China, it was not unusual for brothers from the same family to share just one pair of pants.
Some villagers lived inside earthy caves and slept on rock beds. Young women accepted arranged marriages for dowries worth the price of a donkey.
Though hard to believe, this was the reality in Xihaigu, regarded by the United Nations as “one of the most unfit places for human settlement”.
Xihaigu was not the only place in China plagued by humiliating poverty.
Liangshan, a prefecture in southwest China, captured the nation’s heart in 2016 with pictures of children climbing a cliff with bare hands on a vine ladder, the only thing connecting their mountainous village with the nearest school at the foot of the hill — and the world beyond.
By 2012, China had 832 counties and 128,000 villages just like Xihaigu and Liangshan. They were all listed as priority targets for the nationwide anti-poverty campaign.
The enormity of the task is mind-boggling. So not unexpectedly, when China announced the end of extreme poverty, the news was met by scrutiny and disbelief in some quarters.
Questions have been raised about the reliability of the figures, the adequacy of the poverty standard and the cost-effectiveness of the effort. Let me address each of these questions in turn.
Who has benefited?
According to Chinese President Xi Jinping, 98.99 million rural residents have been lifted out of poverty in the past eight years, bringing the total number of Chinese escaping poverty in the last four decades to 770 million, which accounted for over 70 percent of poverty reduction worldwide
This also means that China met the poverty reduction goal in the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda ten years ahead of schedule.
“We should not forget the fact that China has contributed the most in world poverty alleviation in the past decade,” noted UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.
Leaders of South Asian countries such as Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka also expressed congratulations.
Liu Yongfu, director of the government agency overseeing the effort, told reporters last year that the threshold for extreme poverty was set at 4,000 RMB yuan ($628) per annum.
Slightly above the World Bank benchmark of $1.9 a day, it was “only part of the package”, according to Liu.
“The government also guarantees proper food and clothing, safe housing, free education for children and essential medical services.”
Apart from benefiting its own people, China’s poverty reduction experience has helped other developing countries as well, particularly its neighbors.
For example, China hosted a seminar on poverty policy and practice for Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka in 2 2007
Similar exchanges and projects on development cooperation have been carried out with the five South Asian nations as well as under the China-SAARC framework, including sub- national poverty reduction exhibitions, construction of roads, airports and schools, and vocational and agro-tech training programmes.
Why it has worked?
China’s anti-poverty success can be explained by what may be called a L-E-A-P strategy (i.e., Leadership, Empowerment, All-sector participation and Paired assistance).
Hopefully some elements of the strategy can help other developing countries move faster towards the Sustainable Development Goal of “ending poverty in all its forms” by 2030.
First, leadership.
A campaign on such an enormous scale would not have been possible without the mobilization and execution capacity that the Chinese system is best known for.
Strong leadership is the key to delivering it. In 2017, the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC) declared “war” on poverty.
The choice of word made it abundantly clear to party officials that their leaders were treating the issue with utmost seriousness and urgency.
President Xi personally took charge of the matter. He promised that “no one will be left behind” and warned officials against deceptive efforts.
Apart from setting an ambitious goal, President Xi also called for “targeted poverty alleviation”, demanding tailor-made solutions for different villages and groups.
This strategy avoided the easy, one-size-fits-all solution that often created waste and discontent in a vast, diverse country such as China.
Second, empowerment.
As a Chinese saying goes, “Better teach people how to fish than just give them fish.” Experience shows that people who get rid of poverty by receiving handouts instead of training would soon fall back into poverty once the help is withdrawn.
In Liangshan’s case, young adults were taught vocational skills to help them find jobs in cities. Agricultural experts were sent to pass on know-how about growing cash crops.
Peasants who had only small potatoes for supper have become planters of organic strawberry, a business which brings over 20,000 yuan ($3,140) per head a year.
Third, all-sector participation.
What was most remarkable is the human resource committed to this campaign. More than 255,000 teams of 3 million up-and-coming party officials were sent from across the country to join millions of local officials in the battle against poverty.
They were asked to stay in their posts until their villages were declared “poverty-free”. Many of them were promoted or rewarded with national honours afterwards.
The government channelled 1.6 trillion yuan ($251 billion) into this endeavor, roughly one- sixth of the GDP created by the world’s second largest economy in 2020. Yet poverty alleviation shouldn’t and can’t be the business of the government alone.
China’s corporate sector invested over 1 trillion yuan ($157 billion) in the poverty-stricken areas.
Many 3 companies made donations to rebuild ramshackle dwellings, create funds that rewarded work on village roads or set up convenience stores that sold daily necessities at reduced prices.
What did they get in return? A debt of gratitude and millions of potential customers.
Fourth, paired assistance.
Richer provinces and cities from China’s eastern coast also stepped forward to form pairs with poor ones in the interior.
For example, the coastal province of Fujian partnered with the northwestern province of Ningxia, of which Xihaigu is a part.
When serving as Fujian’s deputy party secretary in the 1990s, Xi visited Ningxia to discuss how to help villagers in Xihaigu emerge from poverty.
He was behind the momentous decision that led to relocating the villagers to more hospitable places at the government’s expense.
Min-Ning, the place name coined by Xi from a combination of Min (another name for Fujian) and Ning (the usual shorthand for Ningxia), has since prospered with the help of farm experts travelling half the country to teach the locals how to grow grapes, wolfberries and raspberries and start their own winery business.
Their rags-to-riches story had been adapted into a drama series which was aired early this year. It became an instant hit with viewers young and old and received a rating of 9.4 out of 10.
What next?
China has reason to be proud of what it has accomplished, but the battle is far from over. By delivering what it has promised, the CPC is driving up expectations.
