RELIGION is meant to guide people, strengthen moral values and show society the difference between right and wrong. It should be a source of peace, honesty and unity, not a shield behind which anyone can hide from criticism. When religious leaders step into political battles, it is natural for the public to ask questions. Is this about serving the people and protecting their values or is it about gaining political influence and power?
Maulana Sahib, with respect comes responsibility. Religious scholars hold an important place in our society and their contributions to education, faith and moral guidance should never be dismissed. Madaris have educated generations of students and provided religious instruction to communities across the country. However, respect for religious institutions does not mean they should remain beyond public scrutiny. No individual, regardless of their title, position or turban, should be exempt from reasonable questions about their actions and intentions.
The real concern is the future of the students who look towards their teachers and religious leaders for guidance. These young people enter Madaris to learn about their faith, develop their character and build a future for themselves. They should not become instruments in political struggles that have little to do with their education or personal aspirations. Their careers, dignity and opportunities matter. If religious institutions are being drawn into political activities, the public deserves clarity about where education ends and political mobilization begins.
Maulana Sahib must therefore address a fundamental question: Are these institutions focused entirely on education, spiritual development and the welfare of their students or are they also being used to strengthen a particular political influence? This is not an accusation that should be settled through rhetoric or personal attacks. It is a legitimate question that deserves a clear, evidence-based answer.
There is another important question Maulana Sahib needs to answer. In 2021, the party you are now supporting took legal action against your own party. What has changed since then? Why are you now standing with a political group that previously challenged your own party in court? Political alliances can change, but people deserve to understand the reasons behind such changes. A clear explanation would help the public judge whether this shift is based on political principles or political interests.
Financial transparency is equally important. If questions have been raised about the sources of funds connected to political or religious activities, those concerns should be addressed through verifiable financial records and the appropriate legal channels.
Ultimately, this debate is not about disrespecting religion or undermining religious scholars. It is about protecting the integrity of religion from the misuse of its influence. Faith should inspire honesty and leadership should demand accountability. Neither should be used to silence legitimate questions.
Maulana Sahib, the public is not asking for perfection. It is asking for honesty, consistency and transparency. If your mission is education and spiritual guidance, explain it openly. If your political decisions are driven by public interest, demonstrate that through your actions. Religious authority can command respect, but lasting public trust can only be earned through accountability.
—The writer is contributing columnist.
