The stabilisation trap

The Unfinished Promise Of Pakistan

 

PAKISTAN has done what the International Monetary Fund asked. It has raised electricity tariffs, cut subsidies, tightened monetary policy, and let the rupee find its level. Inflation has fallen from its 2023 peak of nearly 40% to approximately 10% today. Reserves have stabilised. The current account has swung into surplus. GDP grew 3.7% in FY2026, the highest in four years. By every measure that appears in a quarterly review, the country is recovering. Tell that to the father in Rawalpindi who now spends a third of his daily wage filling his motorcycle. Tell it to the mother in Peshawar deciding between buying flour and buying medicine. Tell it to the small shopkeeper in Karachi who has stopped using his refrigerator because the electricity bill costs more than the goods inside it. For most Pakistanis, the recovery is something that happens in press conferences.

This is the stabilisation trap, and Pakistan is caught inside it with no visible exit. The government has mistaken balance-of-payments management for an economic strategy. It has treated the absence of crisis as the presence of progress. And it has allowed a set of policies designed to avert default to harden into a system that sustains poverty rather than reducing it. Pakistan’s Economic Survey 2026-27, published in June, confirmed what every household already knew, that the national poverty rate has risen to 28.9%, up from 21.9% in 2018-19, pushing approximately 27 million additional Pakistanis into financial distress over six years. Rural poverty now stands at 36.2%. In Balochistan, nearly half the population, 47%, lives below the poverty line. Income inequality has reached its highest level in 27 years, with the Gini coefficient climbing from 28.4 to 32.7. Real monthly household expenditure fell from Rs 31,711 to Rs 29,980, a 5.4% decline. These figures describe families eating less protein, withdrawing children from school, and delaying medical care. They describe a country where the macroeconomy has stabilised and the household has not.

Energy is the sharpest edge of this disconnect. Electricity tariffs have more than doubled from their 2021 levels. The petroleum levy, standing at Rs 114 per litre of petrol, generated over Rs 1.2 trillion in nine months of FY2025-26, extracted not through a broad equitable tax system but through every litre burned in every vehicle on every road. The IMF insisted, correctly in narrow economic terms, that power subsidies were unsustainable. The government replaced them with targeted cash transfers that arrive too slowly and too bureaucratically for families whose daily arithmetic leaves no room for the interval between the price increase and the relief. Power sector circular debt stood at Rs 2.7 trillion as of Q1 2026 according to the Ministry of Finance, with gas sector circular debt adding a further Rs 3.6 trillion, a combined Rs 6.3 trillion in accumulated liabilities that will ultimately be paid not by the industrial consumers enjoying subsidised energy or the exporters shifting profits to Dubai but by the household doing homework by candlelight.

The deeper failure is that stabilisation has never been paired with a structural growth strategy. Pakistan’s tax-to-GDP ratio stands at 10 to 11%, among the lowest for any comparable economy in the world. Agricultural income, accounting for nearly a quarter of GDP, remains substantively untaxed. Real estate absorbs a third of all domestic private investment and contributes a fraction of what comparable economies extract from property transactions. The burden falls overwhelmingly on salaried workers and consumers through withholding taxes, indirect taxes, and petroleum levies, with income tax collected from the salaried class having surged 165% between 2022 and 2025 while nominal salary growth lagged far behind. A government schoolteacher’s salary today buys roughly a third of what it did fifteen years ago.

Every year, more than 500,000 graduates enter the labour market. The formal sector creates fewer than 200,000 jobs. Unemployment climbed 12.69% in FY2026 according to the Economic Survey. Those who find work often start at Rs 25,000 to Rs 35,000 per month, insufficient for a dignified life at current prices. The minimum wage stands at Rs 40,000, while Pakistan Institute of Development Economics calculates that a household genuinely needs Rs 45,000 to meet basic necessities in 2026. The result is a slow, quiet emigration of the capable, 862,000 Pakistanis departing for overseas employment in a single year, and a quiet despair among those left behind.

Pakistan’s 24th IMF programme will end. A 25th will likely follow. Each one addresses the fiscal symptoms of a structural problem that none of them is designed to solve. Genuine reform would require confronting land elites, property magnates, and every politically protected sector that has benefited from a tax system structured to protect them. It would require investing in education, skills, and industrial capacity with the sustained commitment that no Pakistani government has been willing to maintain across a full electoral cycle. It would require a predictable policy environment that investors consistently cite as the primary reason capital goes elsewhere.

A nation’s economic health should not be measured by its balance-of-payments statement. It should be measured by whether a family can afford a meal with protein on the table, whether a graduate can find work that uses what she studied, and whether a father can fill his motorcycle without calculating which other necessity he will sacrifice to pay for it.

Pakistan does not need another round of stabilisation. It needs a growth strategy that makes work more profitable than speculation, distributes the tax burden fairly, and gives 27 million newly impoverished citizens a reason to believe that the recovery they keep hearing about in press conferences will one day arrive at their kitchen table.Until then, the recovery will remain where it has always been, on paper, in press releases, and in the imagination of those who write them.

—The writer is PhD in Political Science, and visiting faculty at QAU Islamabad.

 

Get Alerts