Articles and letters may be edited for the purposes of clarity and space.
Hooliganism in courts
In a surprising development, the sessions judge overseeing the Iddat case requested its transfer to another court without delivering the reserved judgment. This underscores the legal system’s duty to safeguard all seeking justice. The attack on Khawar Maneka, the complainant and former spouse of Bushra Bibi, within the court premises by PTI-affiliated lawyers is condemnable. Responsibility for this act lies not only with the attackers but also with the legal system. This incident highlights the urgent need for protection and integrity within our courts.
As the source of all rights and protections, Pakistani courts must prioritize safety for all citizens, irrespective of their roles in legal proceedings. This responsibility falls on the judiciary, law enforcement, and legal bodies, as courts symbolize the state’s authority and legitimacy. However, there are regrettable instances where those entrusted with upholding the law fail in their duty, undermining the very system they are meant to protect.
This is not the first instance of lawyers resorting to violence on court premises, with pressure groups often instigating such behaviour, even targeting judges. These actions, characterized by intimidation and lawlessness, undermine trust in the legal system, which relies on safeguarding against such misconduct. Despite these recurring incidents, the judiciary has thus far struggled to adequately address and rectify the situation.
In our judiciary’s attempts to reform the system, it must examine the process of seeking justice and its function as well. The credibility of the legal system depends on small actions like these that accumulate in the eyes of the public. The politically active lawyer’s mischievous and unlawful activities should be controlled by the Judiciary in collaboration with Pakistan Bar Council. Sensible, prudent and professional lawyers dislike this type of untoward incidents.
MUNAWAR SIDDIQUI
Lahore
Sanctity
of the Constitution
In Pakistan, amidst the ever-evolving political landscape, the sanctity of the Constitution often teeters on the brink of imbalance. Rather than serving as a steadfast guiding principle, the Constitution is frequently wielded as a weapon by political entities, exacerbating power struggles and perpetuating a cycle of accusations and counter-accusations.
However, the potential for restoring stability lies in the genuine understanding and unwavering adherence to constitutional principles by every individual and institution.
Pakistan’s Constitution stands as the cornerstone of its democratic framework, embodying the aspirations of its people and delineating the roles and responsibilities of its government institutions. Yet, despite its significance, the Constitution is all too often exploited for political gain, undermining the very essence of democracy.
Political parties, driven by their quest for power and influence, manipulate constitutional provisions to serve their immediate interests, often at the expense of the greater good. Instead of engaging in constructive dialogue and working towards consensus, they resort to divisive tactics, polarizing the populace and eroding trust in democratic institutions.
This culture of constitutional manipulation not only breeds cynicism and disillusionment among the populace but also undermines the rule of law, weakening the foundation upon which a just and equitable society is built.
Yet, amidst this turmoil, lies a beacon of hope – the potential for every individual and institution to recommit to the principles of the Constitution and steer the ship of state towards calmer waters.
Education and awareness play a pivotal role in this endeavour, empowering citizens to understand their rights and obligations under the Constitution and holding their elected representatives accountable for upholding democratic values.
GULAB UMID
Turbat
