Soft face of terror!

Faisal Ahmad

FOR years, the Baloch insurgency was defined by traditional guerrilla warfare which includes remote skirmishes and hit-and-run tactics carried out by men in tribal belts.

However, as law enforcement intensified intelligence-based operations (IBOs) to dismantle these networks, a more insidious threat emerged. While the status of the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) as a terrorist organization and foreign-funded proxy is well-documented, a new soft facade has appeared to shield its operations: the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC).

Evidence from high-level defectors and security analysts suggests that the BYC is not an independent civic movement but a calculated political front. Sarfraz Bangalzai, former commander of the United Baloch Army, has explicitly stated that the BLA, BLF and BYC are not separate entities; they are different faces of a single structure of violence. While militant wings execute kinetic operations, the BYC serves as the soft face by mobilizing youth through rallies and sit-ins. By manipulating public sympathy on digital platforms, the BYC functions as a recruiting and ideological wing, rebranding armed rebellion as modern day activism.

BYC is indeed the nursery for suicide terrorism. The establishment of the BYC in 2020 coincides with a chilling transformation in regional militancy: the weaponization of women. Before this period, female suicide attacks were non-existent in Balochistan’s long history of unrest. This changed with Shari Baloch, a highly educated woman whose 2022 attack at Karachi University set a precedent for others like Sumaya Qalandarani and Zarina Rafiq.

The BYC acts as a Recruitment Nursery by providing the raw material (disenchanted, ideologically primed individuals) who are then funneled into the BLA’s Majeed Brigade for specialized suicide missions. By portraying the state as a colonial occupier, BYC leaders like Sabiha Baloch and Maharang Baloch romanticize resistance, making the transition from a protest camp to an explosives-laden vest seem like a natural progression.

The BYC’s most potent tool is the missing persons rhetoric, which is often used to mask operational realities. Recent testimonies, such as that of Raheema Bibi, reveal a darker side to this narrative. Her account highlights how terrorist elements exploit women through domestic channels; in her case, her own husband used her identity to facilitate a suicide bomber. Investigation reveals that many individuals portrayed as missing by the BYC are actually residing in safe houses or training camps across the border, orchestrated by organized structures. The case of Farzana (alias Laiba) further confirms this nexus, detailing how she was groomed by commanders and directed toward BYC leadership to recruit more women for suicide missions.

The documented evidence establishes that the BYC is a sophisticated factory for radicalization. It bridges the gap between peaceful protest and armed militancy, using the sanctity of the right to assembly to feed new and young blood into the Majeed Brigade. Beyond the slogans of human rights lies a calculated machinery sponsored by external actors which is designed to transform activists into ammunition, making the BYC real culprit and the foreign-funded soft face of modern terrorism.

—The writer is an alumnus of QAU, MPhil scholar and a freelance columnist, based in Islamabad.

([email protected])

 

Get Alerts