AGL40▼ -0.01 (0.00%)AIRLINK192.9▲ 4.92 (0.03%)BOP10.21▲ 0.09 (0.01%)CNERGY7.29▲ 0.18 (0.03%)DCL10.24▲ 0.09 (0.01%)DFML41.85▲ 0.28 (0.01%)DGKC107.85▼ -0.06 (0.00%)FCCL37.97▼ -1.03 (-0.03%)FFBL88.7▲ 6.68 (0.08%)FFL14.94▲ 0.04 (0.00%)HUBC121.3▲ 1.84 (0.02%)HUMNL14.48▲ 0.43 (0.03%)KEL6.37▼ -0.03 (0.00%)KOSM8.5▲ 0.43 (0.05%)MLCF49.38▼ -0.09 (0.00%)NBP73.7▲ 0.04 (0.00%)OGDC209▲ 4.15 (0.02%)PAEL32.99▼ -0.57 (-0.02%)PIBTL8.87▲ 0.8 (0.10%)PPL193.5▲ 8.09 (0.04%)PRL34.55▲ 0.94 (0.03%)PTC27.3▼ -0.09 (0.00%)SEARL119.45▼ -0.37 (0.00%)TELE9.71▲ 0.02 (0.00%)TOMCL35.45▲ 0.15 (0.00%)TPLP12.56▲ 0.31 (0.03%)TREET21.42▲ 1.16 (0.06%)TRG61▲ 0.22 (0.00%)UNITY37.15▼ -0.84 (-0.02%)WTL1.73▲ 0.08 (0.05%)

Senate can probe President’s statement: Rabbani

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]
Ijaz Kakakhel
Islamabad

Pakistan People’s Party leader Senator Raza Rabbani on Monday said that Senate can probe into President Arif Alvi’s statement that officials at the presidency “undermined” his command.

The former Senate chairman pointed out that if an inquiry is initiated, the president will have to appear before a committee of the upper house since he is a part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution. The controversy erupted after President Alvi made a startling revelation on Sunday, saying he had refused to sign into law two bills that would give authorities more power to prosecute people for acts against the state and military, a move the law ministry said was unconstitutional. “As God is my witness, I did not sign Official Secrets Amendment Bill 2023 & Pakistan Army Amendment Bill 2023 as I disagreed with these laws,” the president said on his personal social media account — a move that triggered a debate on the interpretation of Article 75. He said he had asked his staff to return the bills unsigned to the legislature within the stipulated time to make them ineffective.

“However, I have found out today that my staff undermined my will and command,” the president added. Talking to journalists, Rabbani, himself a legal expert, said that Alvi’s tweet was inappropriate. “The president is the head of the state, he could have returned the bills constitutionally under Article 75, the way he sent other bills.”

“Neither did he want to sign the bills nor did he want to give his observation on them. What’s this?”
The veteran politician said that the president is part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution and should appear before a Senate committee. The officers involved in this should appear there, he said, adding this committee should investigate and dig out the real facts. “If it is proved that the president has made a false statement, then action can be initiated against him according to the law.” When asked about the status of these bills, Rabbani responded, “It is not yet clear whether the president has signed them or not.

Related Posts

Get Alerts