AGL39.58▼ -0.42 (-0.01%)AIRLINK131.22▲ 2.16 (0.02%)BOP6.81▲ 0.06 (0.01%)CNERGY4.71▲ 0.22 (0.05%)DCL8.44▼ -0.11 (-0.01%)DFML41.47▲ 0.65 (0.02%)DGKC82.09▲ 1.13 (0.01%)FCCL33.1▲ 0.33 (0.01%)FFBL72.87▼ -1.56 (-0.02%)FFL12.26▲ 0.52 (0.04%)HUBC110.74▲ 1.16 (0.01%)HUMNL14.51▲ 0.76 (0.06%)KEL5.19▼ -0.12 (-0.02%)KOSM7.61▼ -0.11 (-0.01%)MLCF38.9▲ 0.3 (0.01%)NBP64.01▲ 0.5 (0.01%)OGDC192.82▼ -1.87 (-0.01%)PAEL25.68▼ -0.03 (0.00%)PIBTL7.34▼ -0.05 (-0.01%)PPL154.07▼ -1.38 (-0.01%)PRL25.83▲ 0.04 (0.00%)PTC17.81▲ 0.31 (0.02%)SEARL82.3▲ 3.65 (0.05%)TELE7.76▼ -0.1 (-0.01%)TOMCL33.46▼ -0.27 (-0.01%)TPLP8.49▲ 0.09 (0.01%)TREET16.62▲ 0.35 (0.02%)TRG57.4▼ -0.82 (-0.01%)UNITY27.51▲ 0.02 (0.00%)WTL1.37▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)

Senate body approves right to appeal against judgement of suo moto

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]
Ijaz Kakakhel
Islamabad

A parliamentary body of Upper House of parliament on Wednesday proposed that in article 178 providing for the appointment of judges for Supreme Court the criteria shall be based on seniority cum fitness so that the recent controversy should be laid to rest while the appointment of CJP should remain on seniority alone.

The Committee discussed in detail the constitutional amendments related to the role of the parliamentary committee in the appointment of judges.

Chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Law and Justice Senator Ali Zafar stated that the Suo Motu jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under 184 of the Constitution is an extremely important judicial function as it enabled the court to enforce the fundamental right of citizens but at the same time the right to appeal against the judgement must be provided in accordance with Islamic injunctions.

Accordingly, the committee unanimously proposed that article 184(3) of the Constitution be amended to include the right of appeal therein. The committee also directed that under the constitution in case of violation of code of conduct the judicial commission shall decide the matter within 90 days.

The committee took up the Protection of Parents Bill presented by the Law Minister. All the committee members agreed that the protection of parents is necessary, and parents should have the right to evict an adult child from the house owned by the parent. The Chairman Syed Ali Zafar committee also stated and all agreed that it is the social, moral, ethical responsibility of all children to give shelter to the parents in their home.

However, the chairman pointed out to the Secretary Law and Minister that various lacunas in the law require amendments so that the law is in conformity with the requirements of the Constitution it was pointed out the Committee that the law appears to violate the fundamental right of ownership of property in as much as it also applies to the property owned by the children.

The committee accordingly directed the minister to amend the law as it felt that the parent should not be allowed to throw out a child who is a minor nor should the minor be punished with 1-year imprisonment as it would be unconstitutional and badly affect family life. Senator Farooq H. Naek and Kamran Murtaza objected to the powers given to Deputy Commissioner and Police to arrest the children and evict them without course to the courts of law.

Related Posts

Get Alerts