ISLAMABAD/NEW DELHI – The US-Iran peace agreement to end war has been welcomed by world leaders, but it is the political and social media reaction to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s statement that remained in the limelight.
In his post on X, Prime Minister Modi welcomed the reported understanding, saying it could help restore stability in the region, support economic activity, and ensure freedom of maritime trade routes. He expressed hope that further dialogue would lead to a lasting and comprehensive agreement. However, the statement did not mention Pakistan or other countries linked in public discourse to mediation efforts, despite the world acknowleding Islamabad for its historic role.
No mention of Pakistan quickly became the focus of debate online. In Pakistan, users questioned why Islamabad was not acknowledged, especially amid claims circulating on social media that Pakistan had played key role in the diplomatic process. The reaction shows broader expectation among many users that any regional diplomatic breakthrough involving West Asia should also recognise Pakistan’s involvement.
A very important but small word “Pakistan” is missing from this statement issued by the leader of a very big country. 😆 https://t.co/rZ3vRbcm6q
— Hamid Mir حامد میر (@HamidMirPAK) June 15, 2026
In India, opposition and political commentators argued that New Delhi failed to play any role in what they described as a diplomatic development. Others framed the discussion as a missed opportunity for New Delhi to assert a stronger role in shaping outcomes in a region that is strategically important for energy and trade.
The conversation was further shaped by earlier statements from Pakistan’s leadership announcing progress on an agreement and a proposed signing ceremony in Geneva on 19 June, which circulated widely across social media and added momentum to competing narratives about who contributed to the process.
In Pakistan, users suggested that Islamabad’s diplomatic engagement with key regional and global actors could enhance its standing if acknowledged internationally. Indian commentators urged a more pragmatic approach, arguing that regional stability should not be viewed through the lens of rivalry alone and that India’s focus should remain on strengthening its ties with Iran and Gulf states.
World is acknowledging Pakistan’s facilitation, which led to its diplomatic profile in the region, particularly at a time when Middle Eastern stability remains closely tied to global energy and trade flows. He also suggested that the development feeds into the broader strategic competition between India and Pakistan, which continues to shape how each country interprets regional events.
India’s Ministry of External Affair responded in measured terms, expressing hope that any de-escalation would support long-term peace and stability. It also reiterated India’s interest in the uninterrupted flow of maritime trade, particularly through key routes such as the Strait of Hormuz.
