Managing trees to save lungs

Rakhshanda Mehtab

In Islamabad, the arrival of spring every year brings with it a cloud of discomfort for thousands, a relentless pollen season that transforms what should be a pleasant bloom into a major public health crisis.

The culprit is often the paper mulberry tree, whose pollen is a high-allergenic agent, overwhelming hospitals and allergy centers with cases of respiratory distress, itchy eyes, and severe allergic reactions. When authorities recently began removing these trees, a wave of concern swept through the community, framed by many as deforestation. But let’s reframe that narrative sharply: this is not deforestation; this is targeted health risk management. We are witnessing a calculated health intervention designed to swap out high pollen-producing trees for low-allergy alternatives, a move that directly addresses a chronic medical emergency.

Consider the numbers that tell a compelling story. Allergy centers have reported a consistent downward trend in pollen and paper mulberry allergy cases and vaccinations, from 16,250 in 2023 to 14,747 in 2024, and projected to drop to 12,449 by the end of 2025. That’s a 23% reduction in just two years. These aren’t abstract figures; they translate to fewer people gasping for breath, fewer children missing school, and a tangible easing of the crushing pressure on hospital OPDs during peak seasons. Health officials have long highlighted how the intensity of paper mulberry pollen spikes hospital admissions, and this initiative aims precisely to loosen that grip. To back this up, imagine the credibility brought by frontline doctors, allergists, pulmonologists, pediatricians, and ENT specialists sharing simple charts in briefings, or a live health dashboard offering weekly pollen season updates, OPD loads, and vaccination trends. This transparency turns skepticism into trust.

Now, shift the lens to the greenery itself. The public’s worry often springs from what they see, visible gaps where trees once stood. The answer lies in making the visible evidence even clearer. Islamabad’s greenery isn’t disappearing; it’s being meticulously managed under a plan. Yes, 29,115 paper mulberry trees have been removed, but that’s paired with a large-scale replacement drive, including the planting of 40,000 new trees, each 8 to 10 feet tall, ensuring an immediate impact. The government emphasizes a multiple-for-one replacement ratio, and this should be showcased through area-wise lists and phase-wise records. Take one phase in 2024 focused on F-9 Park: thousands of paper mulberries came down, but even more saplings went into the ground, all tracked through an official dashboard to avoid contradictory numbers.

Ultimately, the success of this entire effort hinges on clear, visual communication. The strongest tool against skepticism isn’t just words, but accessible proof. This means publishing the city’s master green plan and overlaying it with live satellite imagery so everyone can see the green cover is not just maintained, but strategically enhanced. For high-visibility areas like the Faizabad stretch, where the change is most noticeable, physical information boards with QR codes should link residents directly to interactive maps, detailed timelines, and landscape renders. This transparency does more than just inform, it builds public confidence by showing the concrete steps from removal to renewal. So, let’s view this through a wider lens: it is a necessary public health measure that simultaneously commits to a smarter, more diverse urban forest.

The goal is straightforward, to safeguard the community’s health while actively growing a greener capital for the future.

The writer is MS Research Scholar at IIUI, a freelance Content Writer & a Columnist Contact: [email protected]

Get Alerts