AGL40.16▲ 0.13 (0.00%)AIRLINK131.73▲ 2.42 (0.02%)BOP6.69▼ -0.11 (-0.02%)CNERGY4.47▼ -0.17 (-0.04%)DCL8.82▲ 0.19 (0.02%)DFML40.61▼ -0.34 (-0.01%)DGKC84.08▼ -1.66 (-0.02%)FCCL32.34▼ -0.66 (-0.02%)FFBL68.61▲ 2.08 (0.03%)FFL11.35▼ -0.11 (-0.01%)HUBC111.76▲ 1.18 (0.01%)HUMNL14.31▼ -0.32 (-0.02%)KEL5.22▼ -0.02 (0.00%)KOSM8.98▲ 0.87 (0.11%)MLCF39.43▼ -0.64 (-0.02%)NBP60.29▼ -0.22 (0.00%)OGDC194.94▼ -0.53 (0.00%)PAEL26.69▼ -0.41 (-0.02%)PIBTL7.48▼ -0.16 (-0.02%)PPL155.77▼ -0.05 (0.00%)PRL26.68▼ -0.69 (-0.03%)PTC18.3▼ -0.26 (-0.01%)SEARL83.02▼ -2.08 (-0.02%)TELE8.23▲ 0.33 (0.04%)TOMCL34.55▼ -0.33 (-0.01%)TPLP8.81▼ -0.41 (-0.04%)TREET16.7▼ -0.11 (-0.01%)TRG62.45▼ -0.41 (-0.01%)UNITY27.44▼ -0.31 (-0.01%)WTL1.28▼ -0.02 (-0.02%)

Khawaja brothers granted bail in Paragon Housing case

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

Islamabad

The Supreme Court on Tuesday approved the bail of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leaders Khawaja Saad Rafique and Khawaja Salman Rafique.
The top court approved the bails of the Khawaja brothers against two bonds worth Rs 3 million each.
The brothers have been facing a corruption reference filed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). On December 11, NAB arrested the Rafique brothers after the Lahore High Court (LHC) rejected their request for an extension in their pre-arrest bail in the case pertaining to the housing society scam. The Khawaja brothers had approached the apex court after the LHC had cancelled their bail plea.
After their arrests, NAB Lahore issued a press release and stated that “accused Saad Rafique along with his benamidaar wife Ghazala Saad Rafique, brother Salman Rafique in association with Qaiser Amin Butt and Nadeem Zia established a housing project in the name of Air Avenue which was converted into a new housing project namely M/S Paragon City Pvt Limited. Record shows that M/S Paragon City is an illegal society.
“Accused in collusion, connivance and collaboration of Qaiser Amin Butt and Nadeem Zia cheated the members of public at large and obtained illegal pecuniary benefits from the funds of said illegal housing project,” it added.
Further, it stated, “Accused is operating this illegal housing project through his associates/ co-accused persons who are collecting deposits from general public despite clear directions from LDA that this project is unapproved.”–INP

Related Posts

Get Alerts