Kenya Supreme Court begins delivering verdict on election


Kenya’s Supreme Court on Monday began delivering its judgment on petitions challenging the outcome of the August presidential election, with weeks of political uncertainty looming if the poll is annulled.

Deputy President William Ruto was declared winner of the tightly-fought race, scraping to victory by a margin of less than two percentage points against Raila Odinga, a veteran opposition politician now backed by the ruling party. Odinga filed a petition to Kenya’s top court last month.

He alleged fraud in the vote tallying process and claimed he had “enough evidence” to show he had in fact won the August 9 election, which ranks as one of Africa’s most expensive polls. Although voting day passed off peacefully, the results sparked angry protests in Odinga strongholds and there are fears a drawn-out dispute may deepen an economic malaise and fuel violence in a country with a history of post-poll unrest.

Both the Ruto and Odinga camps have pledged to respect the court’s decision. Judges have spent the last two weeks sifting through boxes of evidence to establish if any irregularities were substantial enough to nullify the election, as was the case with the August 2017 presidential poll, which Odinga also challenged.

Chief Justice Martha Koome began reading out the verdict shortly after midday (0900 GMT), methodically listing the court’s response to the nine issues at the heart of the case. She said the technology used by the Independent and Electoral Boundaries Commission (IEBC) met the standards of “integrity, verifiability, security and transparency”.

Both the Ruto and Odinga camps have pledged to respect the court’s decision.

After 2017’s annulment, the IEBC was under heavy pressure to deliver a clean poll.

But this year’s outcome sparked a rift within the IEBC itself, with four of its seven commissioners accusing chairman Wafula Chebukati of running an “opaque” process. Odinga’s 72-page petition alleges that hackers broke into IEBC servers and uploaded doctored result forms, a claim dismissed by the court.

Chebukati has denied the allegations, insisting he carried out his duties according to the law of the land despite facing “intimidation and harassment”. After assessing the transparency of the poll, the court will finally rule on whether Ruto met the constitutional threshold of 50 percent plus one of the valid votes cast.

If judges order an annulment, a fresh vote must be held within 60 days, but the run-up to a new election is likely to be fractious. Odinga has insisted that any fresh poll must be supervised by a new chairman. The 77-year-old boycotted 2017’s court-ordered re-run, accusing the IEBC of lacking credibility.—AFP

Previous articleUN warns famine ‘at the door’ in Somalia
Next articlePotzel, Haqqani meet earthquake-affected people in Khost