Zahra Choudhary
INTERNATIONAL humanitarian law was designed to protect people when war turns cruel, setting limits even armies should not cross.
Yet a recent Geneva Academy report shows those limits are increasingly ignored. The reality is grim. Civilians are being killed, injured, displaced, raped, starved and terrorized in conflicts worldwide. Homes, hospitals, schools and markets are no longer safe. From Gaza and Sudan to Ukraine, Myanmar and beyond, the same brutal pattern repeats. In many cases, this suffering is not accidental—it is becoming routine, making the situation even more dangerous.
Even more troubling is the growing sense of impunity. When violations go unpunished, laws lose their meaning. This erosion does not happen suddenly but gradually, as unacceptable acts become normalized. The report uses stark language, describing murder, torture, rape and destruction as realities of modern war. Behind these words are real people—families shattered, children growing up in fear and communities destroyed. These are not just numbers but lives cut short. Humanitarian law, while imperfect, has long provided essential limits. It gave victims a basis for justice and set standards for global accountability. When weakened, every conflict risks becoming more brutal. A major concern is inconsistent enforcement by powerful states. The United States, once seen as a key defender of such norms, is often viewed as stepping back. Whether due to political caution or strategic interests, selective enforcement sends a harmful message. When some violations are punished and others ignored, it reflects hypocrisy rather than justice.
This double standard is especially visible in the Global South, where suffering often receives less attention. Such imbalance undermines trust and suggests that some lives matter more than others. No legal system can survive without fairness. Conflicts like those in Ukraine, Gaza and Sudan reveal a shared failure: the world can witness atrocities but struggles to stop them. Documentation alone is not enough. Real action is needed—sanctions, arms restrictions, legal accountability and sustained diplomatic pressure. It also requires refusing to excuse abuses by powerful or allied actors.
There is a deeper cost. Tolerating atrocities lowers moral standards globally. It signals that cruelty works, isolates victims and discourages restraint. Over time, this weakens not only legal systems but the idea that all human life has equal value in war. This is not the time to abandon humanitarian law but to defend it more firmly. The law still exists; what is lacking is the will to enforce it. Governments, courts, media and civil society must increase pressure on violators and demand consistent accountability.
The Geneva Academy report is a warning. Humanitarian law is under strain but not gone. Its future depends on whether the world upholds it in action, not just words. If mass suffering continues without consequences, the breakdown of law will not only be observed—it will be enabled. When the rules of war collapse, the weakest suffer first, but ultimately, everyone loses.
—The writer is associated with National Defence University, Islamabad.
