The announcement of sanctions by the US against Chinese and Belarusian companies allegedly involved in supporting Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme once again brings to light the complex dynamics surrounding global non-proliferation efforts. Similar sanctions have been enacted in the past also without robust evidence being provided, leaving many observers sceptical of accusations levelled against targeted entities. Foreign Office Spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch while strongly reacting to the US move rightly emphasised that items procured have legitimate civilian uses, highlighting the importance of transparent discussions on end-use and end-user verification mechanisms to prevent unjust application of export controls.
The US often champions non-proliferation efforts yet unfortunately has demonstrated double standard in its implementation. While claiming strict controls, some jurisdictions have waived licensing requirements for advanced military technologies for certain countries, fuelling an arms race. Moreover, the US itself contributes to proliferation by providing weapons to regimes with questionable human rights records, such as Israel and India that have been criticised for their oppressive policies. The politicisation of export controls not only undermines credibility of non-proliferation regimes but also exacerbates existing geo-political tensions, further complicating efforts to achieve lasting peace and security.
By employing discriminatory approaches and double standard, major powers risk exacerbating military imbalances and fuelling regional conflicts, ultimately undermining objectives of non-proliferation efforts. Moving forward, it is imperative that non-proliferation measures are implemented with integrity and fairness, guided by a commitment to uphold principles of transparency and accountability. Rather than serving narrow political interests, export controls should be designed, fostering a climate conducive to peaceful resolution of disputes and collective security. Achieving effective non-proliferation requires a concerted effort to address the root causes of arms proliferation, including conflict and geo-political rivalries. Only through genuine international cooperation can we hope to build a safer and more secure world for future generations.
