MUZAFFARABAD – Kashmir Public Action Committee comes under fresh scrutiny for sharing old drone pictures and clips deliberately presented as recent situation to spread misleading claims about situation in Azad Kashmir.
The picture, reportedly taken in April 2026, resurfaced on social media with claims connecting it to recent development after police operation. Fact Check shows that the same image had been available online for several months, exposing the authenticity of the viral narrative.
The revelation also raised concerns over attempts to manipulate public perception by presenting old visual material as evidence of unfolding events. At centre of the dispute is an aerial image allegedly circulated to portray a recent incident in Azad Kashmir despite reportedly originating several months earlier.
The discovery of earlier online presence also challenged claims accompanying the photograph and raised questions about why outdated material was being associated with current developments. Critics argue that presenting old images as fresh evidence can create unnecessary panic, distort facts and misrepresent the actual security situation in the region.
Over 2 dozen Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee Members placed under Fourth Schedule
The controversy intensified allegations that elements linked with Public Action Committee are attempting to exploit social media to influence public opinion and amplify unrest in Azad Kashmir. The campaign also raised questions about whether outdated photographs are being deliberately recycled to create an exaggerated impression of instability and provoke public anger against state institutions.
The fresh incident renewed attention to earlier allegations involving old photographs, videos and remnants of previous conflicts being linked to fresh developments in the region.
Public Action Committee has also faced accusations of attempting to provoke confrontation with state authorities and encourage public unrest through inflammatory narratives. Critics allege that misleading content is being used to generate resentment against state institutions and influence public sentiment during an already sensitive period.
Allegations of deliberate incitement or an organised propaganda campaign remain subject to independent verification. The resurfacing of the April 2026 photograph has nevertheless brought renewed scrutiny to the origins of viral content and the motives behind its circulation.
The controversy also raised fundamental questions about who originally circulated the drone image, why it was linked to a recent incident and whether those sharing it were aware of its earlier existence.
CMH Rawalakot siege ends in coordinated operation; 4 cops among 7 dead
