LAHORE – The contentious ‘Defamation Bill 2024’ lands in Punjab Assembly to deal with fake news on various media platforms. The bill, presented by Minister of Parliamentary Affairs Mujtaba Shuja-ur-Rehman, faced opposition from both the opposition and journalists, who walked out and boycotted the proceedings.
The bill was said to deal with misinformation on social media platforms including YouTube, TikTok, Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, allowing defamation cases to be filed against those peddling fake news.
The defamation bill proposes fines of up to Rs30lacs and special tribunals to hear defamation cases, with quick verdicts expected. The bill further specifies that the high court will handle cases involving allegations against individuals holding constitutional posts.
Punjab Defamation Bill 2024
PML-N government claimed to introduce bill seeking to update defamation laws, but there are concerns about its impact on freedom of expression and the media. There will be restrictions that could limit free speech and press freedom.
Ban on coverage of ongoing cases
One major concern is the ban on discussing ongoing cases, which could hinder public discussion and media reporting on important issues. This restriction might shield powerful individuals from scrutiny.
Massive Fines on Journos
The threat of fines for violating this ban could discourage journalists from reporting on sensitive topics, leading to self-censorship and weakening investigative journalism.
Muzzle on Freedom of Speech
The bill’s rules for online communication could also stifle free speech on social media by penalizing defamatory statements.
Harder to defend against defamation claims
While the bill aims to simplify defamation procedures, its strict timelines and requirements might disadvantage those with limited resources, making it harder to defend against defamation claims.
Journalists reject Punjab Defamation Bill 2024
Lahore Press Club president rejected the Punjab government’s Defamation Bill 2024, calling it undemocratic. Despite efforts to delay the bill, the government proceeded to present it in the assembly, leading to criticism from journalists.