AGL40.3▲ 0.3 (0.01%)AIRLINK130.9▲ 1.37 (0.01%)BOP6.8▲ 0.12 (0.02%)CNERGY4.6▼ -0.03 (-0.01%)DCL8.98▲ 0.04 (0.00%)DFML43.25▲ 1.56 (0.04%)DGKC84.18▲ 0.41 (0.00%)FCCL33.08▲ 0.31 (0.01%)FFBL77.71▲ 2.24 (0.03%)FFL11.8▲ 0.33 (0.03%)HUBC110.62▲ 0.07 (0.00%)HUMNL14.57▲ 0.01 (0.00%)KEL5.66▲ 0.27 (0.05%)KOSM8.25▼ -0.15 (-0.02%)MLCF39.84▲ 0.05 (0.00%)NBP60.85▲ 0.56 (0.01%)OGDC200.25▲ 0.59 (0.00%)PAEL26.79▲ 0.14 (0.01%)PIBTL7.81▲ 0.15 (0.02%)PPL160.3▲ 2.38 (0.02%)PRL26.83▲ 0.1 (0.00%)PTC18.65▲ 0.19 (0.01%)SEARL83.5▲ 1.06 (0.01%)TELE8.19▼ -0.12 (-0.01%)TOMCL34.49▼ -0.02 (0.00%)TPLP9.13▲ 0.07 (0.01%)TREET17.04▼ -0.43 (-0.02%)TRG59.9▼ -1.42 (-0.02%)UNITY27.95▲ 0.52 (0.02%)WTL1.42▲ 0.04 (0.03%)

Court approves Imran’s 14-day judicial remand in 12 cases

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

An anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi approved on Thursday PTI founder Imran Khan’s 14-day judicial remand in 12 cases linked to the May 9 riots. ATC Judge Malik Ijaz Asif rejected a request for a 30-day physical remand by the police and instead approved judicial remand during the hearing held at Adiala jail.

The former premier is incarcerated at Adiala jail and all his cases, including Toshakhana and cypher, are being heard inside the prison premises. The hearing was attended by counsels Malik Faisal and Sardar Shahbaz Khosa representing Imran.

On January 9, Imran was arrested in the GHQ attack case soon after his release warrant was issued in the cypher case. The hearing had commenced at the Adiala jail through a video link and was attended by multiple station house officers.

Rawalpindi’s anti-terrorism special court presided over by Judge Ijaz, had granted a two-day physical remand for Imran Khan in connection to 12 cases related to the May 9 riots following the conclusion of legal arguments.

Following the court’s decision, investigation teams from all police stations were authorised to conduct inquiries into Imran’s involvement within the confines of Adiala jail. The court had explicitly directed that the PTI chief could not be removed from the jail premises.

 

Related Posts

Get Alerts