AGL40.05▲ 0.02 (0.00%)AIRLINK134.21▲ 4.9 (0.04%)BOP6.72▼ -0.08 (-0.01%)CNERGY4.48▼ -0.16 (-0.03%)DCL8.81▲ 0.18 (0.02%)DFML40.86▼ -0.09 (0.00%)DGKC84.7▼ -1.04 (-0.01%)FCCL32.4▼ -0.6 (-0.02%)FFBL68.15▲ 1.62 (0.02%)FFL11.25▼ -0.21 (-0.02%)HUBC110.5▼ -0.08 (0.00%)HUMNL14.35▼ -0.28 (-0.02%)KEL5.25▲ 0.01 (0.00%)KOSM8.4▲ 0.29 (0.04%)MLCF39.49▼ -0.58 (-0.01%)NBP60.68▲ 0.17 (0.00%)OGDC195.31▼ -0.16 (0.00%)PAEL26.81▼ -0.29 (-0.01%)PIBTL7.5▼ -0.14 (-0.02%)PPL156▲ 0.18 (0.00%)PRL26.7▼ -0.67 (-0.02%)PTC18.38▼ -0.18 (-0.01%)SEARL83.5▼ -1.6 (-0.02%)TELE8.24▲ 0.34 (0.04%)TOMCL34.5▼ -0.38 (-0.01%)TPLP8.91▼ -0.31 (-0.03%)TREET16.7▼ -0.11 (-0.01%)TRG63.8▲ 0.94 (0.01%)UNITY27.5▼ -0.25 (-0.01%)WTL1.28▼ -0.02 (-0.02%)

India’s continuing arrogance in Kashmir

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

Haris Bilal Malik

On 31 October, 2019, India formally split up the Muslim-majority region of Jammu and Kashmir into two federal (union) territories. By doing so India violated the UNSC resolutions on the matter and officially issued a new political map indicating Ladakh and Jammu as Indian Union Territories. According to this formal split, both the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh union territories will be administered by two lieutenant governors, Girish Chandra Murmu and Radha Krishna Mathur respectively. They are supposed to report to the Indian Home Secretary based in New Delhi. This clearly defines the motives of the Hindu nationalist government of BJP led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi which revoked Article 370 on 5 August.Unfortunately, the prevalent security environment in Kashmir is dominated by the BJP, which has led India’s arrogance to determine the fate of the disputed region.
In the same vein, right before the formal enforcement of the constitutional split, a local body electoral exercise was carried out in the region. The maiden Block Development Council (BDC) election was held on 24 October under much hype due to the evolved dynamics of the region. However, the region’s main parties such as the National Conference, Peoples Democratic Party and Peoples Conference and other small parties had boycotted the local elections terming them as an ‘undemocratic’ exercise. These parties which have remained the major stakeholders in the politics of the region had turned out against the abrogation of Article 370 that granted the region special status. It was also observed that the political parties had perceived this election as instead a “forced election” primarily because the region was still under severe restrictions. Contrary to this general perception, the Indian government still carried out the post-revocation electoral exercise. This arrogant policy adopted by the Indian Government seems to forcefully instill this notion of ‘our plan our vision’ by the BJP to decide the fate of the Kashmir region.
In addition to this notion, the Hindu-supremacist government of India, headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been shamelessly flaunting the narrative that Kashmir has been ‘put in its place’. This means that contrary to the previous position of the Kashmir region as an autonomous entity under the Indian Union, it has been demoted to now being a ‘union territory’ like other union territories under the federal (Union) government of India. By doing so it seems that India is following a dangerous trajectory of dealing with Kashmir vis-à-vis Pakistan and the international community. In pursuit of its fascist vision inspired by its RSS ideology, the BJP led Indian state has blatantly ignored the global implications which its moves could have regarding the disputed region. Moreover, the ongoing crisis also provides an insight into Kashmir being a victim of the so-called rules based international order that has repeatedly failed to shield the Kashmiri people from the human rights violations of the Indian forces and protect their sovereign will.
It is worth mentioning here that Kashmir is one of the oldest issues pending at the UNSC table. The international community acknowledges Pakistan’s significance as the most important stakeholder vis-à-vis any development on the Kashmir issue. Contrary to Indian moves and suppression of Kashmiris, Pakistan has always insisted on the peaceful settlement of the Kashmir dispute under the UN mandate. Moreover, Pakistan has always encouraged international mediation offers from influential countries especially by the U.S. This was evident during Prime Minister Imran Khan’s first-ever visit to the US on 23 July, 2019, when President Trump had offered to mediate between India and Pakistan. The offer was greatly appreciated by Pakistan as it was aimed at some prospect of seeking a settlement given the evolved security dynamics of the South Asian region for the last few months. Whereas, India has often rejected such offers claiming Kashmir as its internal matter.
As evident from the above-mentioned developments, it seems that India aspires to increasingly project itself as a regional hegemon and as a potential superpower that can do whatever it pleases with a complete disregard for basic human rights. Under this notion, the BJP government led by Prime Minister Modi and inspired by Hindutva ideology is taking offensive measures to forcefully make Kashmir an integral part of India through its brutal political and military actions. The most considerable aspect of such belligerence is that India wrongfully perceives that Pakistan is unlikely to or perhaps unwilling to respond to any Indian move based on certain political, economic and strategic restraints vis-à-vis India. This however is once again a grave underestimation of Pakistan’s resolve and the sensitivity with which such moves are being taken by the Pakistani leadership.
Hence at the present, the rash and irresponsible actions of the BJP led Indian government has once again put at stake the peace and stability of the entire South Asian region, bringing it once again to the brink of conflict. Despite all the criticism worldwide, with its politico-military offensive in Kashmir, it seems that India has already decided to determine the fate of the disputed region through sheer arrogance and brutality. India is mistakenly perceiving that such moves would likely tighten its grip over the restive region that is at the heart of more than 70 years of hostility with Pakistan. India’s policy to forcefully make Kashmir a part of the Indian Union by annexing it through political and military means would serve as a dangerous precedent. This poses a serious deterrent towards the long-desired peaceful settlement of the Kashmir dispute and even with more disastrous consequences for the whole region.
—The writer is a Research Associate at Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) Islamabad, Pakistan.

Related Posts

Get Alerts