AZAD Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) is in political limelight these days with the PML-N and the PPP exchanging sharp accusations of electoral rigging following the first phase of the Legislative Assembly elections. Both parties have resorted to tough language, each questioning the other’s democratic credentials. Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz dismissed the PPP’s allegations, arguing that it was ironic for a party she described as a “master” of electoral manipulation to complain of rigging. PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari accused the PML-N of having a history of benefiting from manipulated elections. Such exchanges may generate political headlines, but they should not overshadow the larger responsibility both parties carry.
It is important to remember that while the PML-N and PPP are coalition partners at the Centre and in Balochistan, they remain distinct political parties with separate electoral interests. Competitive politics naturally intensifies during elections and heated rhetoric is not uncommon. However, both parties have travelled a long distance since the bitter confrontations of the 1990s. The Charter of Democracy marked a turning point, demonstrating political maturity and a shared commitment to democratic norms. They must ensure that electioneering does not drag national politics back to an era of personal hostility. Also the present situation in Rawalakot makes restraint even more essential. Public grievances deserve attention and peaceful protest is a constitutional and democratic right. At the same time, violence, attacks on public property and attempts to exploit genuine concerns for vested interests cannot be justified. Protesters bear the responsibility of distancing themselves from elements seeking to inflame tensions and disrupt public order. The issue of refugee seats, too, should be left to the newly elected Legislative Assembly and the constitutional process rather than becoming a source of street agitation. With the remaining phases of the elections still to be completed, all political stakeholders must respect the electoral process and avoid statements that could further polarize the atmosphere. Ultimately, the strength of democracy lies not in trading accusations but in accepting the people’s verdict and resolving issues through legal and constitutional forums.
