AGL39.71▼ -0.42 (-0.01%)AIRLINK189.85▲ 0.42 (0.00%)BOP9.83▼ -0.51 (-0.05%)CNERGY7.01▼ -0.2 (-0.03%)DCL10.24▲ 0.03 (0.00%)DFML41.31▼ -0.49 (-0.01%)DGKC105.99▼ -2.64 (-0.02%)FCCL37.72▼ -0.87 (-0.02%)FFBL93.41▲ 3.5 (0.04%)FFL15▼ -0.02 (0.00%)HUBC122.3▼ -0.93 (-0.01%)HUMNL14.31▼ -0.14 (-0.01%)KEL6.32▼ -0.02 (0.00%)KOSM8.12▼ -0.28 (-0.03%)MLCF48.78▼ -0.69 (-0.01%)NBP72.31▼ -2.51 (-0.03%)OGDC222.95▲ 9.54 (0.04%)PAEL33.62▲ 0.63 (0.02%)PIBTL9.67▲ 0.6 (0.07%)PPL201.45▲ 1.52 (0.01%)PRL33.8▼ -0.75 (-0.02%)PTC26.59▼ -0.62 (-0.02%)SEARL116.87▼ -1.32 (-0.01%)TELE9.63▼ -0.25 (-0.03%)TOMCL36.61▲ 1.19 (0.03%)TPLP11.95▼ -0.62 (-0.05%)TREET24.49▲ 2.2 (0.10%)TRG61.36▲ 0.46 (0.01%)UNITY36.06▼ -0.63 (-0.02%)WTL1.79▲ 0 (0.00%)

Voice of the People

Share
Tweet
WhatsApp
Share on Linkedin
[tta_listen_btn]

Articles and letters may be edited for the purposes of clarity and space.

 

Reconciliation & collaboration

Government’s repeated attempts at political reconciliation are commendable. Democracy does not mean eternal opposition to each other; it is predicated on public representatives cooperating, collaborating and debating on matters of public interest for the greater good of the nation. NAB said to be a tool of political engineering in spite of fair free and impartial trial of the accused opposition’s leaders.

After spending a huge amount through exchequer and several years exercise, the results dismayed the people. If the government is sincere in arbitration and reconciliation then victimization on political grounds must be stopped. Speedy trials by courts should be conducted without any intervention and pressure from any corner. Even bitter opponents need to be able to sit across from each other with smiles on their faces and sincerity in their intentions.

However, if the government is sincere in arbitration and reconciliation then actions of political vendetta must be stopped. Creating a congenial atmosphere is necessary to initiate dialogue between rival parties.

Unfortunately, Pakistani politics has been entangled in a vicious cycle of victimization, reprisals and harassment of opponents. Each action hardens resolve and its reaction perpetuates the cycle. At some point, someone has to break the chain. From both sides of the aisle, politicians have to sit down, decide to forgive and forget the wounds of the past and seek to sincerely work towards fostering respectful relations. Sticking to one’s own interpretation and narrative will only deepen the divide and prolong the current conflict.

QAZI JAMSHED SIDDIQUI

Lahore

Modi’s

3rd term

The recent re-election of Narendra Modi as the Prime Minister of India for a third term marks a significant moment in South Asian politics. For Pakistan, this development brings both challenges and opportunities. Historically, the relationship between India and Pakistan under Modi’s leadership has been tense, marked by conflicts over Kashmir, cross-border terrorism accusations, and military skirmishes.

The rhetoric from both sides has often been charged, fostering a climate of mutual distrust. With Modi assuming office again, it is crucial for both nations to reflect on the past and seek avenues for constructive engagement.

For Pakistan, the priority should be to advocate for dialogue and peace. Despite our differences, the people of both nations share common cultural and historical bonds that can serve as a foundation for better relations. A stable and peaceful South Asia is essential for regional prosperity and Pakistan must actively pursue diplomatic channels to achieve this goal.

Moreover, the Indian election process, characterized by its scale and complexity, demonstrates a vibrant democratic ethos. However, the impact of majoritarian politics on minority communities and regional stability cannot be ignored.

Pakistan must remain vigilant and responsive to any policies that may affect regional security. In conclusion, while Modi’s third term presents a period of uncertainty, it also offers a chance for renewed efforts towards peace and cooperation. It is incumbent upon both governments to rise above animosities and work towards a future where dialogue and mutual respect prevail.

IQRA BATOOL

Karachi

Gender representation

In the intricate tapestry of Pakistan’s political landscape, the contentious issue of allocating reserved seats for women in parliament continues to capture attention. This issue, currently under scrutiny by the Supreme Court, ignites debates on legal frameworks and societal perceptions of women in politics.

The historical backdrop of this discourse traces back to the constitutional document of 1973, which initially designated ten reserved seats for women. However, during General Zia-ul-Haq’s regime, the number of reserved seats ballooned to twenty, purportedly aiming to enhance women’s political participation. This expansion was later discontinued after the 1988 general elections, marking the end of the women’s quota at the time.

Under General Pervez Musharraf’s leadership, the concept of reserved seats was revived, with sixty seats earmarked for women in the National Assembly. While ostensibly aiming to foster gender parity and empower women politically, the selection process for these seats drew criticism for lacking transparency.

GULAB UMID

Turbat

Related Posts

Get Alerts