US rebalancing policy & regional riddle

Khalid Chandio

WITH China’s fast and astonishing development, the US-China relationship has become the most principle universal relationship in the world today than at any other time in the history. Of much more prominent concern is the vital quadrilateral relationship in South Asia including China, India, the US, and Pakistan. It has both regional and wider ramifications. The connections between these four states are to a great degree complex. At the point, when the “rebalancing” approach was initially taken off in 2011-12, a significant part of the accentuation was put on military activities in the region.
China opposed these activities, and Beijing found a way to show its power in oceanic regional debate with the US allies, specifically Japan and the Philippines. The tug of war between the two giants, i.e. China and the US has every potential to plunge the whole region in getting militarized. But, China has been cautious in reacting militarily to “rebalancing” strategy in strict sense, therefore, it has advanced the idea of restoration of conventional “silk route” in the form of “One Belt One Road” (OBOR) initiative. On the contrary, the Obama government has embraced a harder line against China’s activities and has developed security engagement with partners. These strides apparently represent a few expenses to China’s regional standing and its long-standing objective to decrease the US security presence around its fringe.
The US strategy of “rebalancing” Asia offers a greater number of difficulties to Pakistan than opportunities. Pakistan must know about its near and extended neighbourhood not only in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) but also in the Asia-Pacific. In like manner, Pakistan needs to create opportunities through wise and effective diplomacy in the region as well as with the US. Since Pakistan may find it difficult to stay non-partisan in the US “rebalance”, given its neighbourhood and friendship with China coupled with the country’s grieved association with India, which has effectively adjusted to the US. Subsequently, Pakistan needs to re-strengthen its overlooked “Vision East” policy as next worldwide chess board is being prepared in the Asia-Pacific combined with India’s probability of utilizing America to balance both China and Pakistan. On the off chance that the future US-China relations are helpful than strife-inclined, then Chinese association in Pakistan offers little to worry; it might even advance settling financial improvement that could at last help Pakistan. If not so, tug of war between the two giants, i.e. China and the US might affect Pakistan. Pakistan has generally looked for close ties with both China and the US and it would need to genuinely consider the expenses of putting all it eggs in the China’s basket. Pakistan should never leave the US and rather strive for better relations with the world’s sole but struggling super power.
In the wake of the US drawdown from Afghanistan, the US and its partners are reordering the global security and their dedication to the Asia-Pacific and South Asia regions. The reorientation and the changing arrangements of the US and its partners would affect the regional security environment. Afghanistan and Pakistan, being the prime regional players, would confront the most extreme repercussions. The beginning of new “Cold War” between the US and its contenders, i.e. Russia and China could make the area a battle-ground for geo-political and geo-strategic interests. New regional alliances and identities may develop as well.
In any case, again because of fluctuating nature of Pak-US relations all through the history combined with US-China predictable competition, difficulties to Pakistan are enormous with constrained opportunities. Nuclear Pakistan, having special significance in South Asia, is prone to get influenced either purposely or accidentally in the event of any disorder in South-East Asia. Being vital partner of the US in its war on terror and close companion of China, Pakistan gets itself sandwiched between the two powers. Although Islamabad wishes to stay away from the whole game but the relating conditions are likely to grasp Pakistan into its hold. Because, the handing over of “Gwadar Port” to China and the CPEC have raised the fears, though baseless, of Washington and its partners, especially India with respect to Pakistan’s contribution and role in the existing politico-economic game.
— The writer works for Islamabad Policy Research Institute, a think-tank based in Islamabad.

Share this post

    scroll to top