Age of geo-economics



M. Ziauddin

The globalization process has turned the world into an increasingly interdependent entity. No nation state or a country can now claim to be absolutely sovereign, in both socio-economic or/and military sense. However, without an irreducible minimum sovereignty over its economy and culture as well as its military prowess no country can escape being turned into a subservient state fated to trade its independence for survival. Such nations find themselves constantly threatened by the fate that the nuclear armed Soviet Union had to face in the cold war days.
As globalization is firstly an economic process, it is understandable that security has shifted from the military to the economics. Economic security takes particularly into account the new risks occurring from the combination of the globalized competition and the incredible new role of information, for example threats on data, attacks on public research centers, attacks from financial predators against state currencies, stock market manipulations, short selling exports to damage competitors in the world market etc.
When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi threatens to punish Pakistan with international isolation, he is not talking about political isolation of a nuclear Pakistan. This he cannot achieve even if he were to succeed in mobilizing majority of world opinion against this country.
What, however, we should guard against is being rendered isolated in the geo-economic terms. Already unconfirmed reports are circulating in the region that by heavily subsidizing its textile, leather and surgical exports India is inching towards capturing Pakistan’s markets for these goods which make up nearly 90 per cent of our export earnings. This is something to be looked into urgently and step to neutralize the Indian economic offensive.
Already India has entered into increased manpower export agreements with to GCC countries and Saudi Arabia that are likely to eat into our own share of this market. Kuwait is already out of bounds for our manpower export.
More seriously, the US seems to be working in tandem with India in the latter’s effort to push Pakistan into economic isolation. Though these voices are still very feeble what we should be mindful about is that this is the second time that the US is thinking of creating economic problems for Pakistan. It was at the fag- end of the late senior Bush’s presidency—1990— that sanctions were imposed on Pakistan invoking the Pressler amendment for what Washington said crossing the nuclear ‘Red Line’.
If it is our economic isolation that is being contemplated by India, it is time we do something concrete for our economic security. In the context of politics and international relations economic security is the ability of a nation state to follow its choice of policies to develop the national economy in the manner desired. In today’s complex system of international trade, characterized by multi-national agreements, mutual inter-dependence and availability of natural resources etc., economic security today forms, arguably, as important a part of national security as military policy.
Globalization has produced a redefinition of economic security in light of the risks posed by cross-border networks of non-state actors and by the economic volatility of the new global environment. The relationship between economic globalization and undesirable economic and political outcomes must be specified precisely and assessed carefully, however. Judgments about economic security must weigh the effects of increased volatility introduced by globalization against the benefits of improved economic performance in the longer run. National institutions will remain central to the provision of economic security under conditions of globalization.
A new index called Comprehensive National Power (CNP) has been developed by China. It can be calculated numerically by combining various quantitative indices to create a single number held to measure the power of a nation-state. These indices take into account both military factors (known as hard power) and economic and cultural factors (known as soft power).
The index uses critical mass, economic capacity and military capacity. Due to its indicators, it is often repeatable and easy to define, making it comparable to the Human Development Index in understanding and reliability. Since Pakistan nurses a passionate desire to safeguard an irreducible minimum of its sovereignty in this interdependent and globalized world, one would have taken it as a given that by now our policy makers and geo-strategists would have developed our own CNP index at least on stand-alone basis without any reference to the indices of our close neighbors.
The biggest threat that our economic security faces and which in turn has the potential to seriously undermine our CNP index is the shortage of energy resources. Energy consumption in this day and age generally indicates a nation’s level of industrialization, productivity and standards of living. One hopes our official strategists are aware of this shortcoming and have up their sleeve a fail-safe plan to overcome the problem within shortest possible time.

Share this post

    scroll to top