NATO’s dirty plan in Libya

Sunday, August 28, 2011 - During Ramazan, I am not writing my columns and therefore this letter to the Editor on the situation in Libya after NATO’s and Western powers surrogates have entered Tripoli is in lieu of a column. . The question arises what should be our attitudes towards these foreign puppets’ victory. I had no doubt at any stage in the past what would be the end result of this conflict. The power equations of Ghaddafi supporters and the rebels/traitors, mask of NATO, was not too difficult to understand and the end result of the NATO/Western surrogates was but expected . That Ghaddafi stood the NATO’s filthy war so long should be an indication that Ghaddafi had support of Libyan nationalists till the hilt and is sticking to the war because he has that even now small as it may be which is causinfg Ghaddafi’s heroic stand.. Let no one glorify this Western proxy war. Sarkozy has bagged one of the richest oil fields of the world and that was what was western game plan in Libya.

It should be noted that despite NATO’s dirty game, and the rebels/traitors implementing the dirty plan no one should at all give it any fancy name of liberation or any such high sounding description It is the obvious success of traitors promoting NATO’s interests, selling Libya to foreign powers. Many traitor regimes have established themselves by serving enemies interest. This is another such case. We should not be among the first fools to extend recognition to the NATO surrogates. Another country falls to western imperialism.

Even as a diplomat I have stuck to my principles and I believe principles should be upheld in diplomacy also.. This NATO war for foreign oil and resources must be viewed as what it is. All the usual false and sanctimonious statements that will come from Obama, Sarkozy Ban Ki Moon not withstanding All high sounding concern for humanity and what not would be another bla, bla, bla.

—Via email