Climate pact: Will India cut emissions?


Shashank Bengali

WORLD’S fastest growing major economy — and one of its fastest growing emitters of carbon — was building coal-fired power plants at a rapid clip while its leaders argued that burning the carbon-spewing fossil fuel was necessary for country’s development. Yet over last two years, India has suspended several major coal projects and announced plans to triple its renewable energy capacity by 2022.
When Barack Obama was president, he made fighting climate change a centrepiece of several bilateral meetings with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The pro-business Indian leader took office in 2014 promising to boost manufacturing and bring electricity to far-flung villages, presumably by investing even more heavily in coal, which provides more than 60% of India’s electricity. But as Modi sought closer ties with the US, he became an unlikely proponent of green energy policies. India was one of the last major countries to join the Paris process but adopted ambitious targets. It pledged to slash emissions intensity amount of carbon dioxide it emits for every dollar its economy produces — by at least 33% and ensure that by 2030 at least 40% of its domestically produced electricity comes from solar, wind and other renewable sources.
India’s emissions are expected to triple between 2005 and 2030, but the increase would be much greater if the country did not fulfil those pledges, officials said. While Indian officials have not publicly commented on Trump’s campaign promise to “cancel” the Paris accord, experts say there is frustration that the US is undermining an agreement that developing countries believe was written largely to satisfy Western interests.
Many compared it to President George W. Bush’s rejection of the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement to cut greenhouse gas emissions that his predecessor Bill Clinton had signed. “I think there will be those who feel like the US has just done this once too often — laying the rules for the game and then picking up their ball and walking away,” said Navroz K. Dubash, coordinator of the Initiative on Climate, Energy and Environment at the Centre for Policy Research, a New Delhi think tank. Still, Dubash said, India is likely to stick to its Paris commitments, in part because salvaging the environment has become an important domestic issue.
Scientists have described India, with its 4,700 miles of coastline and 1,300 islands, as one of the countries most vulnerable to rising sea levels. “India had to make ambitious climate targets not just because of global pressure but to protect its own people,” said Vijeta Rattani, a climate change analyst at the Centre for Science and Environment, a New Delhi think tank. Of 16 “ultra-mega power projects” once proposed in India — coal-fuelled plants with a capacity of 4,000 megawatts or more — only two have been built, and even those are hindered by public opposition and financial pressures. India’s weak electricity companies have been unable to distribute much of the new power being generated, and officials said last December that they wouldn’t need to build any new coal-fuelled plants for another decade.
At the same time, the cost of solar power is rapidly falling, making it almost as affordable as cheap coal-based energy. Modi is aiming to attract $100 billion in solar investment by 2022. Yet experts say it is far from certain that India will meet its targets. Like many developing nations, India is relying on richer nations to help finance its investments in renewable energy. But Trump has threatened to cancel $2 billion in pledges the Obama administration made to the Green Climate Fund, which aims to help poor countries deal with climate change. “If the US cuts its pledges, or does not contribute to international funding, that may have an impact on the implementation of the climate plans of developing countries,” Rattani said.
— Courtesy: Los Angeles Times