Pakistan Observer

Appearing from Islamabad, Karachi, Lahore, Peshawar, Muzaffarabad & Quetta

Friday, November 27, 2009, Zil`Hajj 09, 1430

 
Top Stories
Islamabad
Karachi
Lahore
National
Business
Wolrd
Sports
Voice Of People
Archive
Contact Us
 
 
Abdul Sattar
Dr Jassim Taqui
Dr S M Koreshi
Dr Niloufer Mahdi
Robert Clements
Salahuddin Haider
Madhav Nalapat
 
 
  Active Visitors: 30

Total Hits Since June, 2007
50184826

Why issue of Mataram is being raised again?

Afshain Afzal

Indian Muslims are loyal citizens of India but in the recent development their loyalty is being seriously doubted. The Indian Jamaat-e-Islami, in its national conference held in Deoband in Saharanpur district in November 2009, passed a resolution not to recite Vande Mataram being anti-Islam in nature. Vande Mataram was part of a Bengali language book namely Anandamatha, written by a Bengali writer on 7 November, 1875. The song, Vande Mataram, was treated as the national anthem of India for long during British rule but ultimately ‘Jana Gana Mana’, was chosen as the national anthem of independent India because of objections from minorities, especially Muslims.

Although Muslims rejected this song in 1830s but a misleading impression prevails in India that after independence in 1947, Jawaharlal Nehru, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and several other leaders removed the objectionable parts of the song, so there can now be no room for controversy. Those who uphold such belief should not forget that Mohandas Karam Chand Gandhi himself had opposed this song in 1947 when there was a severe communal riot. The issue of Vande Mataram (originally referred as Bande Mataram) is not new for the people of India. It dates back to pre-partition rule of Indian National Congress. There is no doubt that during Congress rule Muslims were victimized and subjected to various kinds to injustices including injury to their religious feelings. Where the Muslims were forced to bow before the Congress tri-colour flag, it was also compulsory in the offices and schools to sing Vande Mataram. The song Vande Mataram was full of passages which were anti-Islam and openly cursed the Muslims. Finally the Congress deleted all the stanzas of the song except first two with a hope to satisfy the Muslims but Muslims out rightly rejected even the first two stanzas. Today, the issue is again being raised as there is a strong Hindu lobby which wants to go ahead with Hindu national agenda without taking minorities into the account.

As an evidence to this claim, we have thousands of books in libraries all over India and Pakistan, where book containing compiled correspondence between Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru in the same regard are present. In fact, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah wrote a letter to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru on March 17, 1938 demanding scrapping of Bande Mataram altogether. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru replied Quaid’s letter on April 6, 1938 in which he replied in these words “Regarding the Bande Mataram song the Working Committee issued a long statement in October last (October 1937) to which I would invite yours attention. First of all, it has to be remembered that no formal national anthem has been adopted by the Congress at any time. It is true, however, that the Bande Mataram song has been intimately associated with Indian nationalism for more than thirty years and numerous associations of sentiments and sacrifices have gathered round it. Popular songs are not made to order, nor they can be successfully imposed. They are grown out of the public sentiment. During all these thirty years or more years the Bade Mataram song was never considered as having any religious significance and was treated as national song in praise of India. Nor, to my knowledge, was any objection taken to it except on political grounds by the Government. When however some objections were raised, the Working Committee carefully considered the matter and ultimately decided to recommend that certain stanzas, which contained certain allegorical references, might not be used on national platforms or occasions. The two stanzas that have been recommended by the Working Committee for the use of national song have not a word or a phrase which can be offend anyone from any point of view and I am surprised that anyone can object to them. They may appeal to some more than to others. Some may prefer another national song. But to compel large number of people to give up what they have long valued and grown attached to is to cause needless hurt to them and injure the national movement itself. It would be improper for the national organization to do this.”

Today when the minorities, especially Muslims are critical of Vande Mataram, there is nothing new in this as it has already been clarified that it is on record that it was resented and challenged even over 70 years back by the Muslims of India. There is no doubt that the recital of this national song by Muslims injures their religious sentiments. One wonders that when there is a national anthem, Jana Gana Mana and no one is opposed to reciting the national anthem then why Vande Mataram is being discussed. I personally believe that there is no need for another national song as it might start a race for adoption of other national songs. In Andhra Pradesh, there is a proposal to introduce ‘Maa Telugu Talliki’ in schools. If such things continue, then there is no end to it and may end into nation vide violence. Despite these facts, there are some minority groups, who consider that Deoband’s resolution on Vande Mataram is without any substance. One such person is Indian Union Minority Welfare and Corporate Minister Salman Khurshid, who is of the view that there was nothing objectionable in the national song. He termed the protest against adoption of Vande Mataram as national song as wrong and uncalled for. But if we carefully examine the statement of former Indian Prime Minister on the issue, we would exactly come to know why Muslims have refused to sing this national song. Indian former Prime Minster, Atal Bihari Vajpai once said “It’s about respect, not worship. The song is a symbol of devotion towards the motherland. We do not aim at idol worship. Those who do not believe in idol worship are free to pray in their own way. But when it comes to worshipping India, our motherland, there should be no controvers” Of course, Muslims only worship Allah and not their motherland. Paying due respect and expressing feelings of love for one’s motherland is another thing. India has right to impose Hindusim on Hindus but minorities are protected by Indian Constitution as well as various other agreements still intact. The most important point that we should never forget is when Indian leaders like Mohandas Karam Chand Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru as well as the Working Committee of All Indian Congress accepted the truth that most of the stanzas of the songs were anti-Islamic then why Indian government is bend upon forcing the Muslims to recite this song. How can anyone expect from Muslims to recite portion of a song which as a whole contains insultive remarks for Muslims and Islam but selected stanzas does not divulging same filth. One wonders, are Hindus going to recite portion of ‘Surat’ from Al Qur’aan which are not critical of idols but as a whole, the ‘Surat’ curses followers of idols?

 

 © Pakistan Observer  1998-2009,
     All rights reserved

Home  |  Top Stories  |  National  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Voice of People

   

HURMAT GROUP

Zahid Malik
President & Editor-in-Chief

Editor Foreign Affairs:

Abdul Sattar

Editor:

Faisal Zahid Malik
Phone: 021-2211777, 2631102

Executive Editor:

Gauhar Zahid Malik
Phone: 051-2852028

GM Marketing:

Ferozuddin Khan
Phone: 0300 918 5669
Email: mktg@pakobserver.net

Ali Akbar House G-8 Markaz, Islamabad, Pakistan
Phone: +92 (051) 2853818, 2852027-8,  Fax: +92 (051) 2262258
Email:
observer@pakobserver.net

Karachi

Lahore

Peshawar

FAISAL ZAHID MALIK
Editor

Phone: 021-2211777,  2631102
Fax: 021-2626902
Email: obskhi@pakobserver.net
 
KHALID BUTT
Resident Editor

Phone: 042-7593341, 7566702
Fax: 042-6300043
Email: obslhr@pakobserver.net
TARIQ SAEED
Resident Editor

Phone: 091-2592766
Fax: 2591705
Mobile: 0321-9001476
Email:tariqobserve@brain.net.pk

Quetta

Muzaffarabad

Online Edition

GHULAM TAHIR
Resident Editor

Phone:081-2829238-40
Fax: 081-2829072
Mobile: 0333-7944760
HAMEED SHAHEEN
Resident Editor

Mobile: 0332-5313879
Email: abdulhameedshaheen@yahoo.com

 

For any query, complaint or suggestion regarding website please feel free to email at: webmaster@pakobserver.net

 

Web Design by AITS Global |  Out Source Web Design