Active Visitors: 227 Total Hits: 18030531 Since June, 2007
Pak N assets to come under pressure
FOLLOWING the footsteps of US Presidential candidates, their running
mates Sarah Palin, Republican Governor of Alaska, and Joe Biden, the
Democratic Senator from Delaware, during their debate at Washington
University in St. Louis on Thursday expressed their views on Pakistan’s
nuclear programme which could be construed as extremely negative totally
ignoring the situation in South Asian region. They bluntly described
Pakistan’s nuclear capability as threat to India and Israel thus
exposing the mindset in the United States and thinking about an Islamic
country.
In their arguments, both candidates likewise agreed that stability in
Pakistan was a major concern. While the gorgeous Governor said Pakistan
and Iran’s nuclear programmes were threat to world peace, Sen Biden was
specific declaring that Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal was a threat to
Israel and India. These uncharitable assertions are in line with the
overall policy of Establishment at the Capitol Hills and it can now be
safely said that whoever wins the race in November elections, the
world’s sole superpower leader will bring Pakistan under pressure in the
next four years over its nuclear programme. To coincide, the United
States has reportedly again expressed desire for access to the Father of
our nuclear programme Dr A Q Khan. Of course Pakistan has rejected the
very idea but in its usual conformist mindset suggested that it was
ready to get all the answers from Dr Khan in case the US has any further
unanswered questions. The debate between the Vice Presidential
candidates and the US demand are clear indications that country’s
nuclear programme and Dr A Q Khan are not yet off the hook. Keeping in
view the prevalent situation, it is now consensus among analysts that
the ongoing turmoil and unrest triggered in the country in the shape of
terrorism and extremism is to create an atmosphere of uncertainty and
insecurity. The objective is to build a case that Pakistan’s nuclear
assets could fall in the hands of rogue elements and IAEA will be asked
to demand the handing over of these assets. We are confident that the
Government and the Nuclear Command and Control Authority are well aware
of these machinations and find a way out so as not to fall in the trap
of those against our national assets. In the meantime, we suggest that
the Government must take all the political leadership into confidence
about these developments so as to come up with a united stance on this
vital issue of national survival.