Daily Pakistan Observer - Online Newspaper
   Appearing from Islamabad, Karachi, Lahore, Peshawar, Muzaffarabad & Quetta

  Monday, April 7, 2008, Rabi Ul Awal 29,1429    

  Top Stories
  Islamabad
  Karachi
  National
  World
  Business
  Sports
  Voice of People
  Archive
  Contact
  PO2
  Trends
  Economy Watch
  Abdul Sattar
  Dr Jassim Taqui
  Dr S M Koreshi
  Dr Niloufer Mahdi
  Robert Clements

Editorial

  Deeper economic relations with China

  Jiye Bhutto slogans in assemblies
 
  Shaukat on flawed energy policy
 

Articles

  Pakistan could become a wheat basket!
 

  Poll in Zimbabwe: What is cooking?
 

  UN probe: Does PDA Govt need it?
 
  Jinnah & indigenisation of Armed Forces
 
  Untangled..!
 
 

Quote of the day

 

If women didn’t exist, all the money in the world would have no meaning.

 
 ASWAD

  Active Visitors: 17
  Total Hits: 15778827
  Since June, 2007
  

Jinnah & indigenisation of Armed Forces

Brig M Sher Khan (R)

Indigenisation means the induction of Indians in the British Indian Armed Forces as King’s Commission Officers (KCOs) before Independence and the emergence of the Dominions of Pakistan and India. Prior to that, all officers were European non-Indians, almost entirely British. However, Viceroy’s Commissioned Officers (VCOs), who after Independence came to be known as Junior Commissioned Officers (JCOs), were all native Indians promoted from the rank and file. Few people are aware of the crucial role Mohammad Ali Jinnah played in bringing about Indianisation against all the odds in an environment that smacked openly about the superiority of the White race and the inferiority of the natives.

The debate and foot-dragging on the part of the British government and the Raj on the pace of Indianisation precipitated a crisis when on 3rd March 1925 Mr. Jinnah, a secular nationalist, threatened a vote of censure because the Government of India’s Indigenisation policy had been ‘disingenuous, dilatory and inadequate’. Earlier, he had scathingly attacked the C-in-C India in the Assembly in February 1925 in no uncertain words: “You come here with one excuse or other, and you tell us that there is this difficulty and that, that there is this to be done and that is to be done….Has there ever been a proposal which we have suggested which was not rash…when have you Englishmen ever agreed with us and said that any proposal we make is not rash? You say, ‘It is rash, be cautious’.

We have been 150 years under this government. You have deprived the people of India of arms. What have you done?” As quoted by Aziz Beg in his book ‘Jinnah and His Times’, “The nationalisation of the Indian Army had been a subject very close to the heart of Jinnah during the 20s and he used all his powers of persuasion to convince the Government of India to speed up the process of making the Indian army a truly national army, officered by Indians. He had battled hard for the establishment of an Indian officers’ training institution, which was then known as the ‘Indian Sandhurst’. He understood that no country could defend its freedom without an armed force led by its own nationals and he found that despite the Government’s acceptance of the idea of increasing the proportion of Indian officers in the Indian army, the rate at which Indians were given commissions was so slow that it would take centuries before the Indian army could dispense with British officers. He was the only Indian delegate who emphatically demanded that the recruitment of British officers should stop immediately and that only Indians be chosen for commissions in the Indian army. He concluded his remarks with these words, ‘We have ample materials. Imagine 320,000,000 people with a history behind them. Does any man believe that we cannot produce 120 boys per year who will be able to stand the rigorous and strictest test of efficiency before they are granted the King’s Commission?’

Finally the Indian Military Academy (IMA) was established at Dehra Doon in 1932 with an intake of only about 60 cadets, among them the late General Mohammad Musa. Cadets receiving their commissions in the Indian Army after training at IMA were referred to as Indian Commissioned Officers (ICOs). This was but a small step towards the huge task of Indigenisation at hand, considering that there were around that time about 17,000 non-Indians serving in the British Indian Army, and by the 1960s only 50% Indianisation was expected to be achieved. This is ample proof of British insincerity to the concept of Indigenisation, but they were overtaken by events with the outbreak of the Second World War and massive mobilisation in India, which resulted in the huge shortage of trained officers, notwithstanding the meagre annual output of IMA. This had to be overcome by granting Emergency Commissions by the thousands (some 15,000) to meet the demands of the War, most of who were demobilised after the War. During and after the War there was an upsurge in demands for Independence that the British had promised for cooperation in the war effort, and a weakened British Empire began to unravel, close shop, pack its bags and return to its own shores post haste. About one third of the Indian army came to the share of Pakistan, but because of the tardy pace of the Indigenisation policy, both Pakistan and Indian armed forces were severely short of officers, compelling both the governments to request thousands of British officers, especially in the technical branches, to stay on for some years. Among those who opted to stay on for some time was Brig Ingall, formerly of 6th DCO Lancers (the writer’s father’s regiment), who set up the Pakistan Military Academy at Kakul after Independence. PMA’s auditorium is named after him; he passed away in USA in 1977 while in his nineties, soon after having paid a visit to PMA and 6 Lancers courtesy GHQ.

Pakistan Army and Air Force set up their own cadet training Academies soon after Independence to meet the needs of its officer cadres (the Navy did so several years later), but in the initial years continued to send some cadets to British Academies out of necessity. Over the years, the Pakistani Academies, and other training facilities, have evolved into world-class institutions, and have been attracting trainees from many Asian and African countries. It is therefore incongruous as to why Pakistan Army, if not the other two Services also, continues to send one cadet each year to Sandhurst for training in a completely foreign environment so that on return he can serve with native troops. (This does not bear comparison with some foreign Staff Colleges, which is on a reciprocal basis. Perhaps it has something to do with our psyche: after six decades of Independence, we still don’t seem to want to cut the apron strings of our former rulers in Britain. Why are trainees at Pakistan Military Academy Kakul still called ‘Gentleman Cadets’? (The newly inducted female cadets are called Lady Cadets). No one, including officers who have served in the faculty at PMA, could give a satisfactory answer when queried by the writer. The British did away with the term long ago, and call their trainees ‘Officer Cadets’ ever since; to find out why, go to the website of the Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst. Maybe it is because we are all basically “lakeer kay fakir; “theirs not to reason why, theirs but to do and die”?

Soon after Independence, a Joint Services Pre-Cadet Training School (JSPCTS) was set up at Quetta. Trainees from all the three Services had to successfully complete a course of about six months duration before they joined their respective Service Academies. The scheme was terminated around 1954. The greatest benefit of this scheme was that, besides toughening up the young boys and introducing them to military discipline, it created lifelong bonds between the officers of the three Services. However, cadets from the Pakistan Navy used to join PMA Kakul for the first term around the early sixties before going to the Naval Academy in Karachi; this scheme too was terminated after some time.

—(The writer frequently contributes articles based upon his experience).

 

Home | Top Stories | Islamabad | Karachi | National | World | Business | Sports | Editorial | Articles | Cartoon | Voice of People

Hurmat Group

President & Editor-in-Chief: Zahid Malik
Editor Foreign Affairs: Abdul Sattar
Editor: Faisal Zahid Malik
Executive Editor: Gauhar Zahid Malik

Deputy Editor (IR): Dr Jassim Taqui

Pakistan Observer, Ali Akbar House G-8 Markaz, Islamabad, Pakistan

Phone: +92 (051) 2853818, 2852027-8
Fax: +92 (051) 2262258
Email: observer@pakobserver.net
 

 © Pakistan Observer  1998-2008, All rights reserved

Web Design by AITS Global
 SEO Powered by Webconcerns